Suppr超能文献

口腔和口咽鳞状细胞癌的分期:MRI与CT在T分期和N分期中的比较

Staging of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx: a comparison of MRI and CT in T- and N-staging.

作者信息

Leslie A, Fyfe E, Guest P, Goddard P, Kabala J E

机构信息

Department of Clinical Radiology, Bristol Royal Infirmary, UK.

出版信息

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999 Jan-Feb;23(1):43-9. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199901000-00010.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to assess the accuracy of CT and MRI in staging of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity and oropharynx.

METHOD

Fifty-one episodes of primary and recurrent SCC were assessed with CT and MRI. The results were compared with pathological staging.

RESULTS

For staging primary tumours, the accuracy of MR was 77% and that of CT was 67%. For detecting recurrent tumour, the accuracy of MR was 89% and that of CT was 100%. For N-staging, nodal sites were divided, according to the site of the primary tumour, into high and low risk. Sensitivity for high risk sites was 60% for clinical assessment, 35% for CT, and 75% for MR. Negative predictive value (NPV) was < or = 50% for all methods. For low risk sites, the NPV was > or = 95% for all methods.

CONCLUSION

For T-staging, MR scanning is overall more accurate than CT. If degraded images and T1 tumours are excluded, the techniques are comparable. MR scanning is oversensitive for recurrent disease. For N-staging, all methods failed to detect small metastatic deposits.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是评估CT和MRI在口腔及口咽鳞状细胞癌(SCC)分期中的准确性。

方法

对51例原发性和复发性SCC进行CT和MRI评估。将结果与病理分期进行比较。

结果

对于原发性肿瘤分期,MR的准确率为77%,CT为67%。对于检测复发性肿瘤,MR的准确率为89%,CT为100%。对于N分期,根据原发性肿瘤的部位将淋巴结部位分为高风险和低风险。高风险部位的临床评估敏感度为60%,CT为35%,MR为75%。所有方法的阴性预测值(NPV)均≤50%。对于低风险部位,所有方法的NPV均≥95%。

结论

对于T分期,MR扫描总体上比CT更准确。如果排除图像质量差和T1期肿瘤,两种技术相当。MR扫描对复发性疾病过度敏感。对于N分期,所有方法均未能检测到小的转移灶。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验