Wester R C, Hui X, Maibach H I, Bell K, Schell M J, Northington D J, Strong P, Culver B D
Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Biol Trace Elem Res. 1998 Winter;66(1-3):101-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02783130.
Literature from the first half of this century reports concern for toxicity from topical use of boric acid, but assessment of percutaneous absorption has been impaired by lack of analytical sensitivity. Analytical methods in this study included inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, which now allows quantitation of percutaneous absorption of 10B in 10B-enriched boric acid, borax, and disodium octaborate tetrahydrate (DOT) in biological matrices. This made it possible, in the presence of comparatively large natural dietary boron intakes for the in vivo segment of this study, to quantify the boron passing through skin. Human volunteers were dosed with 10B-enriched boric acid, 5.0%, borax, 5.0%, or disodium octaborate tetrahydrate, 10% in aqueous solutions. Urinalysis, for boron and changes in boron isotope ratios, was used to measure absorption. Boric acid in vivo percutaneous absorption was 0.226 (SD = 0.125) mean percent dose, with flux and permeability constant (Kp) calculated at 0.009 microg/cm2/h and 1.9 x 10(-7) cm/h, respectively. Borax absorption was 0.210 (SD = 0.194) mean percent dose, with flux and Kp calculated at 0.009 microg/cm2/h and 1.8 x 10(-7) cm/h, respectively. DOT absorption was 0.122 (SD = 0.108) mean percent, with flux and Kp calculated at 0.01 microg/cm2/h and 1.0 x 10(-7) cm/h, respectively. Pretreatment with the potential skin irritant 2% sodium lauryl sulfate had no effect on boron skin absorption. These in vivo results show that percutaneous absorption of boron, as boric acid, borax, and disodium octaborate tetrahydrate, through intact human skin is low and is significantly less than the average daily dietary intake. This very low boron skin absorption makes it apparent that, for the borates tested, the use of gloves to prevent systemic uptake is unnecessary. These findings do not apply to abraded or otherwise damaged skin.
本世纪上半叶的文献报道了人们对局部使用硼酸产生毒性的担忧,但由于缺乏分析灵敏度,对经皮吸收的评估受到了阻碍。本研究中的分析方法包括电感耦合等离子体质谱法,该方法现在能够对富集硼-10的硼酸、硼砂和四水八硼酸钠(DOT)在生物基质中的硼-10经皮吸收进行定量。在本研究的体内实验部分,由于存在相对大量的天然膳食硼摄入量,这使得对穿过皮肤的硼进行定量成为可能。人类志愿者被给予含5.0%富集硼-10的硼酸、5.0%硼砂或10%四水八硼酸钠的水溶液。通过尿液分析硼及硼同位素比值的变化来测量吸收情况。硼酸的体内经皮吸收为平均剂量的0.226(标准差=0.125)%,通量和渗透系数(Kp)分别计算为0.009微克/平方厘米/小时和1.9×10⁻⁷厘米/小时。硼砂的吸收为平均剂量的0.210(标准差=0.194)%,通量和Kp分别计算为0.009微克/平方厘米/小时和1.8×10⁻⁷厘米/小时。DOT的吸收为平均剂量的0.122(标准差=0.108)%,通量和Kp分别计算为0.01微克/平方厘米/小时和1.0×10⁻⁷厘米/小时。用潜在的皮肤刺激物2%月桂基硫酸钠预处理对硼的皮肤吸收没有影响。这些体内实验结果表明,硼酸、硼砂和四水八硼酸钠形式的硼通过完整的人体皮肤的经皮吸收很低,且明显低于平均每日膳食摄入量。这种极低的硼皮肤吸收表明,对于所测试的硼酸盐,使用手套来防止全身吸收是不必要的。这些发现不适用于有擦伤或其他损伤的皮肤。