Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜外膜下幽门肌切开术与开放性幽门肌切开术治疗婴儿肥厚性幽门狭窄:哪种更好?

Laparoscopic extramucosal pyloromyotomy versus open pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: which is better?

作者信息

Fujimoto T, Lane G J, Segawa O, Esaki S, Miyano T

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 1999 Feb;34(2):370-2. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(99)90212-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the advantages or disadvantages of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy compared with open transumbilical fold pyloromyotomy.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive laparoscopic extramucosal pyloromyotomies (LP) performed from 1994 to 1997 were compared with 30 consecutive open pyloromyotomies (OP) performed during the same period with regard to age at operation, body weight, thickness of hypertrophied pyloric muscle, operating time, time of return to full feeding, frequency of postoperative emesis, surgical complications, and degree of surgical stress reflected by interleukin-6 (IL-6). LP was performed according to conventional techniques, and OP was performed using a transumbilical fold approach.

RESULTS

The groups were matched for age at operation, preoperative clinical and physical status, laboratory data, and size of the hypertrophied pylorus assessed by ultrasonography. There was a learning curve with LP; the average operating time required for the first 10 cases was significantly longer than the time required for OP, but later cases took just as long as OP cases. Time taken to full feeding was significantly shorter in the LP group than the OP group (LP, 38 hours v OP, 64 hours). One case was converted from LP to OP because of mucosal perforation. The incidence of postoperative emesis was significantly higher in the OP group than in the LP group (OP, 25% v LP, 3%). The mean length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in LP (P < .01). The intraoperative peak values of IL-6 in LP were significantly lower than those in the OP group (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The advantages of LP are improved cosmesis, decreased surgical stress with earlier postoperative recovery, and shorter hospitalization. Because LP uses reusable devices, and the mean period of hospitalization is shorter, average operating costs could be reduced, representing a net saving in total hospital charges.

摘要

背景/目的:本研究旨在评估腹腔镜幽门肌切开术与开放经脐皱襞幽门肌切开术相比的优缺点。

方法

将1994年至1997年连续施行的30例腹腔镜黏膜外幽门肌切开术(LP)与同期连续施行的30例开放幽门肌切开术(OP)在手术年龄、体重、肥厚幽门肌厚度、手术时间、完全恢复经口喂养时间、术后呕吐频率、手术并发症以及白细胞介素-6(IL-6)反映的手术应激程度等方面进行比较。LP按照传统技术施行,OP采用经脐皱襞入路。

结果

两组在手术年龄、术前临床和身体状况、实验室数据以及超声评估的肥厚幽门大小方面相匹配。LP存在学习曲线;前10例所需的平均手术时间明显长于OP组,但后续病例所需时间与OP组相同。LP组完全恢复经口喂养的时间明显短于OP组(LP组为38小时,OP组为64小时)。1例因黏膜穿孔由LP转为OP。OP组术后呕吐发生率明显高于LP组(OP组为25%,LP组为3%)。LP组平均住院时间明显更短(P <.01)。LP组术中IL-6峰值明显低于OP组(P <.01)。

结论

LP的优点是美容效果改善、手术应激降低且术后恢复更早、住院时间更短。由于LP使用可重复使用的器械,且平均住院时间较短,平均手术成本可能降低,从而总体医院费用实现净节省。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验