Inouye S K, Bogardus S T, Charpentier P A, Leo-Summers L, Acampora D, Holford T R, Cooney L M
Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn 06504, USA.
N Engl J Med. 1999 Mar 4;340(9):669-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903043400901.
Since in hospitalized older patients delirium is associated with poor outcomes, we evaluated the effectiveness of a multicomponent strategy for the prevention of delirium.
We studied 852 patients 70 years of age or older who had been admitted to the general-medicine service at a teaching hospital. Patients from one intervention unit and two usual-care units were enrolled by means of a prospective matching strategy. The intervention consisted of standardized protocols for the management of six risk factors for delirium: cognitive impairment, sleep deprivation, immobility, visual impairment, hearing impairment, and dehydration. Delirium, the primary outcome, was assessed daily until discharge.
Delirium developed in 9.9 percent of the intervention group as compared with 15.0 percent of the usual-care group, (matched odds ratio, 0.60; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.39 to 0.92). The total number of days with delirium (105 vs. 161, P=0.02) and the total number of episodes (62 vs. 90, P=0.03) were significantly lower in the intervention group. However, the severity of delirium and recurrence rates were not significantly different. The overall rate of adherence to the intervention was 87 percent, and the total number of targeted risk factors per patient was significantly reduced. Intervention was associated with significant improvement in the degree of cognitive impairment among patients with cognitive impairment at admission and a reduction in the rate of use of sleep medications among all patients. Among the other risk factors per patient there were trends toward improvement in immobility, visual impairment, and hearing impairment.
The risk-factor intervention strategy that we studied resulted in significant reductions in the number and duration of episodes of delirium in hospitalized older patients. The intervention had no significant effect on the severity of delirium or on recurrence rates; this finding suggests that primary prevention of delirium is probably the most effective treatment strategy.
由于住院老年患者的谵妄与不良预后相关,我们评估了一种多组分策略预防谵妄的有效性。
我们研究了852名70岁及以上入住教学医院普通内科的患者。通过前瞻性匹配策略纳入来自一个干预单元和两个常规护理单元的患者。干预措施包括针对谵妄六个危险因素管理的标准化方案:认知障碍、睡眠剥夺、活动减少、视力障碍、听力障碍和脱水。直至出院,每天评估主要结局谵妄。
干预组谵妄发生率为9.9%,而常规护理组为15.0%(匹配优势比,0.60;95%置信区间,0.39至0.92)。干预组谵妄总天数(105天对161天,P = 0.02)和发作总次数(62次对90次,P = 0.03)显著更低。然而,谵妄严重程度和复发率无显著差异。干预的总体依从率为87%,每位患者的目标危险因素总数显著减少。干预与入院时存在认知障碍患者的认知障碍程度显著改善以及所有患者睡眠药物使用率降低相关。在每位患者的其他危险因素方面,活动减少、视力障碍和听力障碍有改善趋势。
我们研究的危险因素干预策略使住院老年患者谵妄发作的数量和持续时间显著减少。该干预对谵妄严重程度或复发率无显著影响;这一发现表明谵妄的一级预防可能是最有效的治疗策略。