• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大隐静脉移植术治疗既往行内膜切除术和支架置入术后复发性颈动脉狭窄。病例报告。

Saphenous vein interposition graft for recurrent carotid stenosis after prior endarterectomy and stent placement. Case report.

作者信息

Coumans J V, Watson V E, Picken C A, McGrail K M

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 1999 Mar;90(3):567-70. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.90.3.0567.

DOI:10.3171/jns.1999.90.3.0567
PMID:10067932
Abstract

Although the use of carotid artery stents is increasing, the management of recurrent stenosis after their placement is undefined. The authors report on a patient who underwent two left carotid endarterectomies followed by left carotid angioplasty and stent placement for recurrent stenosis. A third symptomatic recurrence was subsequently managed by placement of a saphenous vein interposition graft from the common carotid artery to the distal cervical internal carotid artery. The patient remained without hemispheric or retinal ischemia at his 5-month follow-up visit. Interposition grafting should be considered as a treatment option for carotid restenosis after initial endarterectomy and stent placement.

摘要

尽管颈动脉支架的使用正在增加,但其置入后复发性狭窄的处理方法尚无定论。作者报告了一名患者,该患者接受了两次左颈动脉内膜切除术,随后因复发性狭窄接受了左颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术。第三次出现症状性复发后,通过将大隐静脉从颈总动脉移植至颈内动脉远端进行处理。在5个月的随访中,患者未出现半球或视网膜缺血。对于初次内膜切除术后和支架置入术后的颈动脉再狭窄,应考虑采用移植术作为一种治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Saphenous vein interposition graft for recurrent carotid stenosis after prior endarterectomy and stent placement. Case report.大隐静脉移植术治疗既往行内膜切除术和支架置入术后复发性颈动脉狭窄。病例报告。
J Neurosurg. 1999 Mar;90(3):567-70. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.90.3.0567.
2
Recurrent stenosis of common carotid-intracranial internal carotid interposition saphenous vein bypass graft caused by intimal hyperplasia and treated with endovascular stent placement. Case report and review of the literature.
J Neurosurg. 1999 Mar;90(3):571-4. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.90.3.0571.
3
A fifteen-year experience with carotid endarterectomy after a formal operative protocol requiring highly frequent patch angioplasty.一项为期15年的颈动脉内膜切除术经验,该手术遵循要求频繁进行补片血管成形术的正式手术方案。
J Vasc Surg. 2000 Apr;31(4):724-35. doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.104591.
4
Surgical treatment of carotid in-stent-restenosis: novel strategy and current management.颈动脉支架置入术后再狭窄的外科治疗:新策略与当前管理
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Dec;60(8):517-24. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1311535. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
5
In-stent recurrent stenosis after carotid artery stenting: life table analysis and clinical relevance.颈动脉支架置入术后支架内再狭窄:生命表分析及临床意义
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Dec;38(6):1162-8; discussion 1169. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.08.021.
6
Redo carotid surgery: An analysis of materials and configurations used in carotid reoperations and their influence on perioperative stroke and subsequent recurrent stenosis.
J Vasc Surg. 1999 Jan;29(1):72-80; discussion 80-1. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70350-2.
7
The evolving surgical management of recurrent carotid stenosis.复发性颈动脉狭窄的外科治疗进展
J Vasc Surg. 1992 Sep;16(3):354-62; discussion 362-3.
8
Carotid angioplasty and stenting is safe and effective for treatment of recurrent stenosis after eversion endarterectomy.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术对于外翻式内膜切除术术后复发性狭窄的治疗是安全有效的。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Sep;60(3):645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.288. Epub 2014 May 1.
9
Reoperations for carotid artery stenosis: role of primary and secondary reconstructions.颈动脉狭窄的再次手术:一期和二期重建的作用
J Vasc Surg. 2001 Mar;33(3):495-503. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.111730.
10
Intraoperative use of stents for the management of unacceptable distal internal carotid artery end points during carotid endarterectomy: short-term and midterm results.颈动脉内膜切除术中使用支架处理不可接受的颈内动脉远端终点:短期和中期结果
J Vasc Surg. 2000 Sep;32(3):420-7; 427-8. doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.109332.