Scaraggi F A, De Mitrio V, Marino R, Speciale V, Di Bari L, Petronelli M, Schiraldi O
Centro Emostasi e Trombosi, Dipartimento di Clinica Medica, Immunologia e Malattie Infettive, University of Bari School of Medicine, Italy.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1999 Jan;10(1):33-8. doi: 10.1097/00001721-199901000-00005.
Recent studies have shown that treatment with a continuous infusion of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is far more convenient than administration by bolus intermittent injections and may allow a substantial reduction in the dose. We present the case of a 26-year-old patient with hemophilia A, who had a high-titer inhibitor to both human and porcine factor VIII, and who had recently been admitted to hospital because of a bilateral severe ilio-psoas hematoma. Two subsequent courses of treatment with rFVIIa by bolus intermittent injection showed only a partial efficacy. A further administration of rFVIIa was therefore carried out using a continuous infusion regimen that proved to be fully efficacious. During the continuous infusion course levels of factor VII coagulant activity were in the range 18.2-5.2 U/ml, while the prothrombin time, expressed as an International Normalized Ratio, remained within the range 0.57-0.71. The continuous infusion, compared with the administration of the bolus intermittent infusion, reduced the amount of rFVIIa required by approximately 40-50%. Statistical analysis demonstrated that there was a strong positive correlation between the rate of infusion of rFVIIa and levels of factor VII coagulant activity (r = +0.941; P < 0.001), and a very significant negative correlation between levels of factor VII coagulant activity and prothrombin time values (r = -0.897; P < 0.001). In accordance with previous findings, our experience confirms that, when prolonged therapy is required, treatment with rFVIIa by continuous infusion is more convenient than administration of bolus intermittent injections, and may allow the saving of a large amount of drug. Moreover, we suggest potential additional advantages of the continuous infusion regimen over bolus intermittent injections, such as a better efficacy and a stronger correlation between prothrombin time and factor VII coagulant activity levels.
近期研究表明,持续输注重组活化因子VII(rFVIIa)进行治疗比大剂量间歇性注射给药更为便捷,且可能大幅降低剂量。我们报告一例26岁甲型血友病患者,其对人源和猪源因子VIII均有高滴度抑制物,近期因双侧严重髂腰肌血肿入院。随后两次采用大剂量间歇性注射rFVIIa的治疗疗程仅显示出部分疗效。因此,采用持续输注方案进一步给予rFVIIa治疗,结果证明完全有效。在持续输注疗程中,因子VII凝血活性水平在18.2 - 5.2 U/ml范围内,而以国际标准化比值表示的凝血酶原时间保持在0.57 - 0.71范围内。与大剂量间歇性输注相比,持续输注使所需rFVIIa的量减少了约40% - 50%。统计分析表明,rFVIIa输注速率与因子VII凝血活性水平之间存在强正相关(r = +0.941;P < 0.001),因子VII凝血活性水平与凝血酶原时间值之间存在非常显著的负相关(r = -0.897;P < 0.001)。与先前的研究结果一致,我们的经验证实,当需要长期治疗时,持续输注rFVIIa进行治疗比大剂量间歇性注射给药更为便捷,且可能节省大量药物。此外,我们认为持续输注方案相对于大剂量间歇性注射可能还有其他潜在优势,如更好的疗效以及凝血酶原时间与因子VII凝血活性水平之间更强的相关性。