Roodnat J I, Zietse R, Mulder P G, Rischen-Vos J, van Gelder T, IJzermans J N, Weimar W
Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Rotterdam-Dijkzigt, The Netherlands.
Transplantation. 1999 Feb 27;67(4):576-80. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199902270-00015.
The growing number of patients awaiting a kidney transplant raises questions about allocation of kidneys to the elderly and about the use of elderly donors. In all reported studies analyzing the influence of age on the outcome after renal transplantation, age is investigated as a categorical variable.
We studied age both as a categorical (Kaplan-Meier) and as a continuous (Cox) variable in a total of 509 cyclosporine-treated recipients of a primary cadaveric kidney graft who underwent transplantation between July 1983 and July 1997. For the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the population was divided into three comparably sized age groups: 17-43 years (n=171), 44-55 years (n=169), and 56-75 years (n=169).
Patient survival was better and graft survival censored for death was worse in the younger patients. Overall graft survival (end point was death or graft failure) was not significantly influenced by age. In the Cox proportional hazards analysis, transplantation year turned out to be an important, independent variable influencing all end points. Because the influence was not linear, three periods were defined in which the relative risk remained stable: 1983-1990, 1991-1993, and 1994-1997. In the second period, the relative risk for transplant failure or death was 49% of that in the first period. In the third period, the relative risk had decreased to 22% of that in the first period. Recipient age and donor age were significant predictors of overall transplant failure. There was no interaction between these variables and transplantation year. Within each transplantation period, an increase in recipient age by 1 year increased the relative risk for overall graft failure by only 1.44%. The influence of donor age followed a J-shaped curve with a minimum at 30 years. The influence of increasing either recipient or donor age was counteracted by the improving results over time.
Considering the improving results over time, there are, at this moment, no arguments for an age restriction for kidney transplant recipients or donors.
等待肾移植的患者数量不断增加,这引发了关于肾脏分配给老年人以及使用老年供体的问题。在所有报道的分析年龄对肾移植后结果影响的研究中,年龄均作为分类变量进行研究。
我们在1983年7月至1997年7月期间接受首次尸体肾移植的509例接受环孢素治疗的受者中,将年龄作为分类变量(Kaplan-Meier法)和连续变量(Cox法)进行研究。在Kaplan-Meier分析中,将人群分为三个规模相当的年龄组:17 - 43岁(n = 171)、44 - 55岁(n = 169)和56 - 75岁(n = 169)。
年轻患者的患者生存率更高,因死亡而 censored 的移植物生存率更低。总体移植物生存率(终点为死亡或移植物失败)不受年龄的显著影响。在Cox比例风险分析中,移植年份是影响所有终点的一个重要的独立变量。由于这种影响不是线性的,因此定义了三个相对风险保持稳定的时期:1983 - 1990年、1991 - 1993年和1994 - 1997年。在第二个时期,移植失败或死亡的相对风险是第一个时期的49%。在第三个时期,相对风险降至第一个时期的22%。受者年龄和供者年龄是总体移植失败的重要预测因素。这些变量与移植年份之间没有相互作用。在每个移植时期内,受者年龄每增加1岁,总体移植物失败的相对风险仅增加1.44%。供者年龄的影响呈J形曲线,在30岁时最低。随着时间推移结果的改善,抵消了受者或供者年龄增加的影响。
考虑到随着时间推移结果的改善,目前没有理由对肾移植受者或供者设置年龄限制。