Foley David P, Patton Pamela R, Meier-Kriesche Herwig-Ulf, Li Qin, Shenkman Betsy, Fujita Shiro, Reed Alan, Hemming Alan W, Kim Robin D, Howard Richard J
Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Clin Transpl. 2005:101-9.
As the population ages, the transplant community will continue to see "elderly" patients with end-stage kidney disease who are seeking transplantation. In this report we describe long-term outcomes of 315 primary kidney transplants performed at the University of Florida in recipients aged > or = 60 years and compare them to results from 3 younger recipient cohorts. Among recipients > or = 60 years, patient survival was significantly worse than for younger recipients but no differences in graft or death-censored graft survival were seen. We suspect that although patient survival was worst in the oldest group, there were likely other causes of graft loss within the younger groups that balanced the effects of death on graft survival in the oldest group. Among recipients aged > or = 60 years, patient survival at 10 years was 55% for living-donor kidney recipients and 46% for deceased-donor kidney recipients. African-American recipients had a higher risk of mortality and graft loss in all age groups after deceased donor kidney transplantation but not after living donor transplantation. Delayed graft function negatively impacted outcomes among all recipients and the adverse effects were greater after deceased donor than living donor transplantation. These effects were also seen within the oldest recipient age group. Increased donor age was a significant risk factor for death and graft loss among all age groups after deceased donor kidney transplantation but not among living-donor kidney recipients. More specifically, recipients aged > or = 60 years who received kidneys from donors > or = 60 years demonstrated significantly worse outcomes when compared to those receiving donor kidneys < 60 years. The presence of diabetes mellitus in recipients > or = 60 years was not a significant risk factor for mortality or graft loss after transplantation. Acceptable results can be obtained after kidney transplantation in recipients aged > or = 60 years. Future investigations should focus on improving recipient selection in the elderly population, identifying strategies to minimize DGF in deceased donor kidneys, understanding all variables involved in the risk associated with recipient race, and increasing living donor transplantation across all age groups.
随着人口老龄化,移植领域将会持续面临寻求肾脏移植的老年终末期肾病患者。在本报告中,我们描述了佛罗里达大学为年龄≥60岁的受者进行的315例初次肾脏移植的长期结果,并将其与3个较年轻受者队列的结果进行比较。在年龄≥60岁的受者中,患者生存率显著低于较年轻的受者,但移植肾或死亡删失移植肾生存率无差异。我们推测,尽管年龄最大组的患者生存率最差,但较年轻组可能存在其他导致移植肾丢失的原因,这些原因平衡了年龄最大组中死亡对移植肾存活的影响。在年龄≥60岁的受者中,活体供肾受者10年患者生存率为55%,尸体供肾受者为46%。在尸体供肾移植后,非裔美国受者在所有年龄组中死亡和移植肾丢失风险均较高,但活体供肾移植后并非如此。移植肾功能延迟对所有受者的预后均有负面影响,尸体供肾移植后的不良影响大于活体供肾移植。在年龄最大的受者组中也观察到了这些影响。供者年龄增加是尸体供肾移植后所有年龄组死亡和移植肾丢失的重要危险因素,但在活体供肾受者中并非如此。更具体地说,年龄≥60岁且接受年龄≥60岁供者肾脏的受者与接受年龄<60岁供者肾脏的受者相比,预后明显更差。年龄≥60岁的受者中存在糖尿病并非移植后死亡或移植肾丢失的重要危险因素。年龄≥60岁的受者进行肾脏移植后可获得可接受的结果。未来的研究应集中于改善老年人群的受者选择、确定将尸体供肾移植肾功能延迟降至最低的策略、了解与受者种族相关风险的所有变量以及增加所有年龄组的活体供肾移植。