Suppr超能文献

来自12个国家的23名欧洲病理学家在诊断乳腺疾病和报告癌的预后特征方面取得的一致性。欧盟乳腺筛查病理学工作组。

Consistency achieved by 23 European pathologists from 12 countries in diagnosing breast disease and reporting prognostic features of carcinomas. European Commission Working Group on Breast Screening Pathology.

作者信息

Sloane J P, Amendoeira I, Apostolikas N, Bellocq J P, Bianchi S, Boecker W, Bussolati G, Coleman D, Connolly C E, Eusebi V, De Miguel C, Dervan P, Drijkoningen R, Elston C W, Faverly D, Gad A, Jacquemier J, Lacerda M, Martinez-Penuela J, Munt C, Peterse J L, Rank F, Sylvan M, Tsakraklides V, Zafrani B

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Virchows Arch. 1999 Jan;434(1):3-10. doi: 10.1007/s004280050297.

Abstract

A detailed analysis of the consistency with which pathologists from 12 different European countries diagnose and classify breast disease was undertaken as part of the quality assurance programme of the European Breast Screening Pilot Network funded by the Europe against Cancer Programme. Altogether 107 cases were examined by 23 pathologists in 4 rounds. Kappa statistics for major diagnostic categories were: benign (not otherwise specified) 0.74, atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) 0.27, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) 0.87 and invasive carcinoma 0.94. ADH was the majority diagnosis in only 2 cases but was diagnosed by at least 2 participants in another 14, in 9 of which the majority diagnosis was benign (explaining the relatively low kappa for this category). DCIS in 4 (all low nuclear grade) and invasive carcinoma (a solitary 1-mm focus) in 1. The histological features of these cases were extremely variable; although one feature that nearly all shared was the presence of cells with small, uniform, hyperchromatic nuclei and a high nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio. The majority diagnosis was DCIS in 33 cases; kappa for classifying by nuclear grade was 0.38 using three categories and 0.46 when only two (high and other) were used. When ADH was included with low nuclear grade DCIS there was only a slight improvement in kappa. Size measurement of DCIS was less consistent than that of invasive carcinoma. The majority diagnosis was invasive carcinoma in 57 cases, the size of the majority being 100% in 49. The remainder were either special subtypes (adenoid cystic, tubular, colloid, secretory, ductal/medullary) or possible microinvasive carcinomas. Subtyping was most consistent for mucinous (kappa, 0.92) and least consistent for medullary carcinomas (kappa, 0.56). Consistency of grading using the Nottingham method was moderate (kappa=0.53) and consistency of diagnosing vascular invasion, fair (kappa=0.38). There was no tendency for consistency to improve from one round to the next, suggesting that further improvements are unlikely without changes in guidelines or methodology.

摘要

作为由“欧洲抗癌计划”资助的欧洲乳腺癌筛查试点网络质量保证计划的一部分,对来自12个不同欧洲国家的病理学家诊断和分类乳腺疾病的一致性进行了详细分析。共有107个病例由23位病理学家分4轮进行检查。主要诊断类别的kappa统计数据如下:良性(未另行说明)为0.74,非典型导管增生(ADH)为0.27,导管原位癌(DCIS)为0.87,浸润性癌为0.94。ADH仅在2例中为多数诊断,但在另外14例中至少有2名参与者诊断出ADH,其中9例的多数诊断为良性(这解释了该类别的kappa相对较低)。4例为DCIS(均为低核分级),1例为浸润性癌(一个孤立的1毫米病灶)。这些病例的组织学特征差异极大;尽管几乎所有病例都共有的一个特征是存在细胞核小、均匀、深染且核质比高的细胞。33例的多数诊断为DCIS;按核分级分类时,使用三个类别时kappa为0.38,仅使用两个类别(高分级和其他分级)时kappa为0.46。当ADH与低核分级DCIS合并时,kappa仅有轻微改善。DCIS的大小测量一致性不如浸润性癌。57例的多数诊断为浸润性癌,其中49例多数的大小为100%。其余病例要么是特殊亚型(腺样囊性癌、管状癌、黏液癌、分泌性癌、导管/髓样癌),要么是可能的微浸润癌。黏液性癌的亚型分类一致性最高(kappa为0.92),髓样癌的亚型分类一致性最低(kappa为0.56)。使用诺丁汉方法分级的一致性为中等(kappa = 0.53),诊断血管侵犯的一致性为一般(kappa = 0.38)。从一轮到下一轮没有一致性提高的趋势,这表明如果不改变指南或方法,进一步改善不太可能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验