• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

23名欧洲病理学家采用五种分类方法对乳腺导管原位癌进行分类所达到的一致性。欧盟乳腺筛查病理学工作组。

Consistency achieved by 23 European pathologists in categorizing ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using five classifications. European Commission Working Group on Breast Screening Pathology.

作者信息

Sloane J P, Amendoeira I, Apostolikas N, Bellocq J P, Bianchi S, Boecker W, Bussolati G, Coleman D, Connolly C E, Dervan P, Eusebi V, De Miguel C, Drijkoningen M, Elston C W, Faverley D, Gad A, Jacquemier J, Lacerda M, Martinez-Penuela J, Munt C, Peterse J L, Rank F, Sylvan M, Tsakraklides V, Zafrani B

机构信息

University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Hum Pathol. 1998 Oct;29(10):1056-62.

PMID:9781641
Abstract

The increased detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by mammographic screening, the greater use of breast-conserving surgery, and the recognition that certain histological subtypes are associated with a greater risk of local recurrence has led to the formulation of several new classifications of DCIS in recent years. There are, however, no data concerning the degree of consistency with which these schemes can be applied by reasonable numbers of pathologists. Thirty-three cases of DCIS were thus examined by a working group of 23 European pathologists who categorized them using five recently published classifications: (1) that of the European Pathologists' Working Group based on differentiation (a combination of nuclear grade and cell polarization) with categories of poorly, intermediately, and well differentiated; (2) one based entirely on nuclear grade with categories of high, intermediate, and low, currently in use in the UK national and EC-funded breast screening programs; (3) the same classification in which only two categories, high nuclear grade and other, were used; (4) the Van Nuys system in which lesions are divided into high grade, non-high grade with necrosis and non-high grade without necrosis; and (5) a two-category classification based entirely on the presence or absence of comedo necrosis. Of the three systems with three categories, Van Nuys gave the highest overall kappa statistic of 0.42. Others gave similar values of 0.37 and 0.35 showing that assessing cell polarization in addition to nuclear grade neither improves nor worsens consistency. In all three systems, the middle category was associated with the lowest value for kappa. Of the two systems with two categories, that based on nuclear grade gave the highest overall kappa of 0.46 and that based on comedo necrosis the lowest of 0.34. The most robust histological features were thus high- and low-grade nuclei and necrosis as long as the latter did not involve the recognition of a comedo growth pattern. These values probably represent the maximum achievable, at least by reasonable numbers of pathologists in everyday practice. They are better than those previously reported for classification based entirely on architecture, but further improvement is needed.

摘要

乳腺钼靶筛查中导管原位癌(DCIS)检出率的增加、保乳手术的更多应用以及认识到某些组织学亚型与局部复发风险更高相关,导致近年来出现了几种新的DCIS分类方法。然而,尚无关于合理数量的病理学家应用这些分类方案的一致程度的数据。因此,一个由23名欧洲病理学家组成的工作组检查了33例DCIS病例,并使用最近发表的五种分类方法对其进行分类:(1)欧洲病理学家工作组基于分化(核分级和细胞极化的组合)的分类,分为低分化、中分化和高分化类别;(2)一种完全基于核分级的分类,分为高、中、低类别,目前在英国国家和欧盟资助的乳腺筛查项目中使用;(3)同一分类方法,但仅使用高核分级和其他两个类别;(4)范努伊斯系统,其中病变分为高级别、伴有坏死的非高级别和不伴有坏死的非高级别;(5)一种完全基于粉刺样坏死存在与否的两类分类方法。在三种有三个类别的系统中,范努伊斯系统的总体kappa统计值最高,为0.42。其他系统的值相似,分别为0.37和0.35,表明除核分级外评估细胞极化既没有提高也没有降低一致性。在所有三种系统中,中间类别与kappa的最低值相关。在两种有两个类别的系统中,基于核分级的系统总体kappa最高,为0.46,基于粉刺样坏死的系统最低,为0.34。因此,最可靠的组织学特征是高、低级别核以及坏死,只要后者不涉及粉刺样生长模式的识别。这些值可能代表了至少在日常实践中由合理数量的病理学家所能达到的最大值。它们比以前完全基于结构的分类报告的值要好,但仍需要进一步改进。

相似文献

1
Consistency achieved by 23 European pathologists in categorizing ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using five classifications. European Commission Working Group on Breast Screening Pathology.23名欧洲病理学家采用五种分类方法对乳腺导管原位癌进行分类所达到的一致性。欧盟乳腺筛查病理学工作组。
Hum Pathol. 1998 Oct;29(10):1056-62.
2
Pathologists' agreement with experts and reproducibility of breast ductal carcinoma-in-situ classification schemes.病理学家与专家的一致性及乳腺导管原位癌分类方案的可重复性。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2000 May;24(5):651-9. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200005000-00003.
3
Prediction of local recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using five histological classifications: a comparative study with long follow-up.使用五种组织学分类法预测乳腺导管原位癌的局部复发:一项长期随访的比较研究
Hum Pathol. 1998 Sep;29(9):915-23. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(98)90196-4.
4
Ideas in pathology. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a proposal for a new simplified histological classification association between cellular proliferation and c-erbB-2 protein expression.病理学观点。乳腺导管原位癌:关于一种新的简化组织学分类以及细胞增殖与c-erbB-2蛋白表达之间关联的提议。
Mod Pathol. 1994 Feb;7(2):257-62.
5
Prognostic classification of breast ductal carcinoma-in-situ.乳腺导管原位癌的预后分类
Lancet. 1995 May 6;345(8958):1154-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90982-6.
6
Reproducibility of new classification schemes for the pathology of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.乳腺导管原位癌病理学新分类方案的可重复性
J Clin Pathol. 1998 Jun;51(6):450-4. doi: 10.1136/jcp.51.6.450.
7
A critical appraisal of six modern classifications of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS): correlation with grade of associated invasive carcinoma.对六种现代乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)分类的批判性评价:与相关浸润性癌分级的相关性
Histopathology. 1996 Nov;29(5):397-409. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1996.d01-513.x.
8
Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: reproducibility of histological subtype analysis.乳腺导管原位癌:组织学亚型分析的可重复性
Hum Pathol. 1997 Aug;28(8):967-73. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(97)90013-7.
9
The clinical behavior of breast carcinoma is probably determined at the preinvasive stage (ductal carcinoma in situ).乳腺癌的临床行为可能在浸润前期(原位导管癌)就已确定。
Cancer. 1997 Nov 1;80(9):1740-5.
10
Causes of inconsistency in diagnosing and classifying intraductal proliferations of the breast. European Commission Working Group on Breast Screening Pathology.乳腺导管内增生性病变诊断与分类不一致的原因。欧盟乳腺筛查病理学工作组
Eur J Cancer. 2000 Sep;36(14):1769-72. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00181-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Histopathological Correlation of Breast Carcinoma with Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System.乳腺癌与乳腺影像报告和数据系统的组织病理学相关性
Malays J Med Sci. 2022 Aug;29(4):65-74. doi: 10.21315/mjms2022.29.4.7. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
2
Deep learning-based grading of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast histopathology images.基于深度学习的乳腺组织病理图像导管原位癌分级。
Lab Invest. 2021 Apr;101(4):525-533. doi: 10.1038/s41374-021-00540-6. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
3
Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study.
在一项大规模国际评分者间可靠性研究中,组织病理学导管原位癌特征的预后价值
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Oct;183(3):759-770. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05816-x. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
4
Inter-observer reproducibility of classical lobular neoplasia (B3 lesions) in preoperative breast biopsies: a study of the Swiss Working Group of breast and gynecopathologists.术前乳腺活检中经典小叶肿瘤(B3 病变)的观察者间可重复性:瑞士乳腺和妇科病理学家工作组的研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Jun;146(6):1473-1478. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03195-w. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
5
Grading Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the Breast - What's Wrong with It?乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)分级——它有什么问题?
Pathol Oncol Res. 2020 Apr;26(2):665-671. doi: 10.1007/s12253-019-00760-8. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
6
Interobserver variability in upfront dichotomous histopathological assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: the DCISion study.乳腺导管原位癌术前二分类组织病理学评估的观察者间变异性:DCISion 研究。
Mod Pathol. 2020 Mar;33(3):354-366. doi: 10.1038/s41379-019-0367-9. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
7
Breast Cancer Prognostic Factors in the Digital Era: Comparison of Nottingham Grade using Whole Slide Images and Glass Slides.数字时代的乳腺癌预后因素:使用全切片图像和玻璃切片对诺丁汉分级的比较
J Pathol Inform. 2019 Apr 3;10:11. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_29_18. eCollection 2019.
8
The diagnostic challenge of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ.低级别导管原位癌的诊断挑战
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Jul;80:39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 May 20.
9
Histopathological grading of breast ductal carcinoma in situ: validation of a web-based survey through intra-observer reproducibility analysis.乳腺导管原位癌的组织病理学分级:通过观察者内再现性分析对一项基于网络的调查进行验证
Diagn Pathol. 2015 Jul 10;10:93. doi: 10.1186/s13000-015-0320-2.
10
Significance of rat mammary tumors for human risk assessment.大鼠乳腺肿瘤对人类风险评估的意义。
Toxicol Pathol. 2015 Feb;43(2):145-70. doi: 10.1177/0192623314532036. Epub 2014 May 28.