Yoshida M, Karasawa M, Naruse T, Fukuda M, Hirashima K, Oh H, Ninomiya H, Abe T, Saito K, Shishido H, Moriyama Y, Shibata A, Motoyoshi K, Nagata N, Miura Y
Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Kawasaki City, Japan.
Int J Hematol. 1999 Feb;69(2):81-8.
The clinical effects of concomitant use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) on empiric antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenic patients were evaluated in a randomized fashion. Two hundred and fourteen neutropenic febrile episodes (neutrophil counts < 1.0 x 10(9)/l) were treated with flomoxef sodium and tobramycin with or without G-CSF. The resolution of fever at day 4 (excellent response) or at day 7 (good response) was deemed effective. Among 157 evaluable episodes, the observed excellent responses were 31 (38.8%) and the good responses were 20 (25.0%) in the G-CSF group; those in the control group were 26 (33.8%) and 25 (32.5%), respectively. The overall efficacy rate was 63.8% (51/80) in the G-CSF group and 66.2% (51/77) in the control group (not significant). The initial neutrophil count was 0.186 +/- 0.249 x 10(9)/l in the G-CSF group and 0.235 +/- 0.290 x 10(9)/l in the control group, and rose to 2.889 +/- 4.198 x 10(9)/l and 0.522 +/- 0.844 x 10(9)/l, respectively, at day 7. These results indicate that G-CSF does not affect the rate of response to empiric antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenic patients, although a significant effect of G-CSF was observed on neutrophil recovery.
以随机方式评估了粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)联合使用对发热性中性粒细胞减少患者经验性抗生素治疗的临床效果。214例中性粒细胞减少发热发作(中性粒细胞计数<1.0×10⁹/L)患者接受了氟氧头孢钠和妥布霉素治疗,部分患者联合使用或不使用G-CSF。第4天(优效反应)或第7天(良好反应)发热消退被视为有效。在157例可评估发作中,G-CSF组观察到的优效反应为31例(38.8%),良好反应为20例(25.0%);对照组分别为26例(33.8%)和25例(32.5%)。G-CSF组总有效率为63.8%(51/80),对照组为66.2%(51/77)(无显著差异)。G-CSF组初始中性粒细胞计数为0.186±0.249×10⁹/L,对照组为0.235±0.290×10⁹/L,第7天时分别升至2.889±4.198×10⁹/L和0.522±0.844×10⁹/L。这些结果表明,G-CSF不影响发热性中性粒细胞减少患者对经验性抗生素治疗的反应率,尽管观察到G-CSF对中性粒细胞恢复有显著影响。