Yuen K H, Peh K K, Billa N
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Science Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1999 Mar;25(3):353-6. doi: 10.1081/ddc-100102181.
The bioavailability of a generic preparation of naltrexone (Narpan) was compared with the innovator product, Trexan. Twelve healthy volunteers participated in the study, conducted according to a completely randomized, two-way crossover design. The preparations were compared using the parameters area under the plasma concentration-time curve AUC0-infinity, peak plasma concentration Cmax, and time to reach peak plasma concentration Tmax. No statistically significant difference was observed between the logarithmic transformed AUC0-infinity and the logarithmically transformed Cmax values of the two preparations. Also, no statistically significant difference was observed between the untransformed Tmax values. In addition, the 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the logarithmic transformed AUC0-infinity values of Narpan over those of Trexan was found to lie between 0.87 and 1.01, while that of the logarithmic transformed Cmax values was between 0.94 and 1.23, both being within the bioequivalence limit of 0.80-1.25. The numerical values of the elimination half-life (t1/2) obtained with the two preparations were also not significantly different and were comparable to those reported in the literature.
将纳曲酮仿制药(Narpan)的生物利用度与创新产品Trexan进行了比较。12名健康志愿者参与了该研究,研究按照完全随机的双向交叉设计进行。使用血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积AUC0-∞、血浆峰浓度Cmax和达到血浆峰浓度的时间Tmax等参数对两种制剂进行比较。两种制剂经对数转换后的AUC0-∞值和经对数转换后的Cmax值之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。此外,未转换的Tmax值之间也未观察到统计学上的显著差异。另外,发现Narpan与Trexan经对数转换后的AUC0-∞值之比的90%置信区间在0.87至1.01之间,而经对数转换后的Cmax值之比的90%置信区间在0.94至1.23之间,两者均在生物等效性限度0.80 - 1.25范围内。两种制剂获得的消除半衰期(t1/2)的数值也无显著差异,且与文献报道的数值相当。