Suppr超能文献

单肺通气期间的动脉氧合:联合麻醉与全身麻醉的比较。

Arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation: combined versus general anesthesia.

作者信息

Garutti I, Quintana B, Olmedilla L, Cruz A, Barranco M, Garcia de Lucas E

机构信息

Service of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Hospital General Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1999 Mar;88(3):494-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199903000-00005.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The optimal anesthetic management of patients undergoing thoracotomy for pulmonary resection has not been definitely determined. We evaluated whether general i.v. anesthesia (propofol-fentanyl) provides superior PaO2 during one-lung ventilation (OLV) compared with thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) with supplemental local and general anesthetics. We studied 60 patients who had prolonged periods of OLV for elective thoracic surgery for lung cancer and who were prospectively randomized into two groups. In 30 patients (GA group), fentanyl/propofol/rocuronium anesthesia was used. Another 30 patients (TEA group) were anesthetized with propofol/rocuronium/epidural thoracic bupivacaine 0.5%. A double-lumen endotracheal tube was inserted, and mechanical ventilation with 100% oxygen was used during the entire study. Arterial and venous blood gases were recorded before surgery in a lateral position with two-lung ventilation, 15 and 30 min after OLV (OLV + 15 and OLV + 30, respectively) in all patients. We measured PaO2, venous central oxygen tension, arterial and central venous oxygen saturation, venous admixture percentage (Qs/Qt%), and arterial and central venous oxygen content. The mean values for PaO2 during OLV in the GA group after 15 min (175 mm Hg) and 30 min (182 mm Hg) were significantly (P < 0.05) higher compared with the TEA group (120 and 118 mm Hg, respectively). Furthermore, Qs/Qt% was significantly (P < 0.05) increased in the TEA group during OLV. There were no other significant differences. We conclude that using the TEA regimen is associated with a lower PaO2 and a larger intrapulmonary shunt during OLV than with total i.v. anesthesia alone.

IMPLICATIONS

Sixty patients undergoing elective lung surgery during a prolonged period of intraoperative one-lung ventilation were studied and randomized to receive general i.v. anesthesia or general i.v. anesthesia combined with thoracic epidural anesthesia. The arterial oxygenation in the first group was better than that in the second group during one-lung ventilation.

摘要

未标注

对于接受开胸肺切除术患者的最佳麻醉管理尚未明确确定。我们评估了与采用局部和全身麻醉补充的胸段硬膜外麻醉(TEA)相比,全身静脉麻醉(丙泊酚-芬太尼)在单肺通气(OLV)期间是否能提供更高的动脉血氧分压(PaO₂)。我们研究了60例因择期胸科手术治疗肺癌而需要长时间OLV的患者,并将其前瞻性随机分为两组。30例患者(全身麻醉组)采用芬太尼/丙泊酚/罗库溴铵麻醉。另外30例患者(TEA组)采用丙泊酚/罗库溴铵/0.5%胸段硬膜外布比卡因麻醉。插入双腔气管导管,在整个研究过程中使用100%氧气进行机械通气。在所有患者双肺通气侧卧位手术前、OLV后15分钟和30分钟(分别为OLV + 15和OLV + 30)记录动脉和静脉血气。我们测量了PaO₂、静脉中心氧张力、动脉和中心静脉血氧饱和度、静脉混合血百分比(Qs/Qt%)以及动脉和中心静脉氧含量。全身麻醉组在OLV后15分钟(175 mmHg)和30分钟(182 mmHg)时的PaO₂平均值显著高于TEA组(分别为120和118 mmHg,P < 0.05)。此外,TEA组在OLV期间的Qs/Qt%显著增加(P < 0.05)。没有其他显著差异。我们得出结论,与单纯全静脉麻醉相比,采用TEA方案在OLV期间与较低的PaO₂和较大的肺内分流相关。

启示

对60例在长时间术中单肺通气期间接受择期肺手术的患者进行了研究,并随机分为接受全身静脉麻醉或全身静脉麻醉联合胸段硬膜外麻醉。在单肺通气期间,第一组的动脉氧合优于第二组。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验