• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)修订后的行业指导文件:独立主要标准,评估多用途隐形眼镜护理液的抗菌效果比较

Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of multi-purpose lens care solutions using the FDA's revised guidance document for industry: stand-alone primary criteria.

作者信息

Lever A M, Miller M J

机构信息

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Global Vision Care, Rochester, NY 14609, USA.

出版信息

CLAO J. 1999 Jan;25(1):52-6.

PMID:10073638
Abstract

PURPOSE

We evaluated six single-bottle, multi-purpose lens care solutions and a two component lens care system for disinfection efficacy according to the stand-alone primary criteria within the recently published U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidelines.

METHODS

One-tenth mL of 1 x 10(8) colony forming units (CFU)/mL of bacterial and fungal challenge organisms was added to each test solution. Following a specified period (e.g., each manufacturer's labeled minimum disinfection time), aliquots of inoculated test solution were neutralized and plated on validated recovery media. After incubation the number of viable microorganisms were enumerated and mean log reductions determined.

RESULTS

ReNu and ReNu MultiPlus met the FDA's acceptance criteria for stand-alone disinfectants against all challenge organisms: Staphylococcus aureus, Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans, and Fusarium solani. Opti-Free Express failed to meet the FDA's stand-alone disinfectant acceptance criteria for S. aureus, S. marcescens and C. albicans and Opti-Free Express with Opti-Free Supraclens failed to meet the acceptance criteria for either S. aureus and C. albicans. Opti-One failed to meet the FDA's stand-alone disinfectant acceptance criteria for C. albicans and F. solani. Both Complete and Solo-Care failed to meet the FDA's acceptance criteria for C. albicans.

CONCLUSIONS

This evaluation provides a direct comparison of antimicrobial activity (based on stand-alone criteria) for commercially available multi-purpose lens care solutions at their labeled minimum disinfection times. The results of this study should be considered when selecting appropriate lens care systems for patients.

摘要

目的

根据美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)最近发布的指南中的独立主要标准,我们评估了六种单瓶多用途隐形眼镜护理液和一种双组分隐形眼镜护理系统的消毒效果。

方法

向每种测试溶液中加入0.1 mL浓度为1×10⁸菌落形成单位(CFU)/mL的细菌和真菌挑战微生物。在规定时间后(例如,每个制造商标明的最短消毒时间),取接种后的测试溶液等分试样进行中和,并接种到经过验证的复苏培养基上。培养后,计算存活微生物的数量并确定平均对数减少量。

结果

润明(ReNu)和润明多功能护理液(ReNu MultiPlus)符合FDA对所有挑战微生物(金黄色葡萄球菌、粘质沙雷氏菌、铜绿假单胞菌、白色念珠菌和茄病镰刀菌)的独立消毒剂接受标准。傲滴恒润(Opti-Free Express)不符合FDA对金黄色葡萄球菌、粘质沙雷氏菌和白色念珠菌的独立消毒剂接受标准,而傲滴恒润与傲滴超净护理液(Opti-Free Supraclens)组合不符合对金黄色葡萄球菌和白色念珠菌的接受标准。傲滴全护理液(Opti-One)不符合FDA对白色念珠菌和茄病镰刀菌的独立消毒剂接受标准。全能护理液(Complete)和索罗护理液(Solo-Care)均不符合FDA对白色念珠菌的接受标准。

结论

本评估提供了市售多用途隐形眼镜护理液在其标明的最短消毒时间下抗菌活性(基于独立标准)的直接比较。在为患者选择合适的隐形眼镜护理系统时,应考虑本研究结果。

相似文献

1
Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of multi-purpose lens care solutions using the FDA's revised guidance document for industry: stand-alone primary criteria.使用美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)修订后的行业指导文件:独立主要标准,评估多用途隐形眼镜护理液的抗菌效果比较
CLAO J. 1999 Jan;25(1):52-6.
2
Disinfection efficacy of contact lens care solutions against ocular pathogens.隐形眼镜护理液对眼部病原体的消毒效果。
CLAO J. 2001 Jan;27(1):16-22.
3
Antifungal efficacy of soft contact lens disinfecting solutions against Fusarium solani and Candida albicans.软性隐形眼镜消毒溶液对茄病镰刀菌和白色念珠菌的抗真菌效果。
Clin Exp Optom. 2012 Mar;95(2):207-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2011.00694.x. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
4
Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of multi-purpose hydrogel lens care solutions.多用途水凝胶镜片护理液的抗菌效果比较
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2001;24(3):94-9. doi: 10.1016/s1367-0484(01)80023-0.
5
A new method for evaluation of compatibility of contact lenses and lens cases with contact lens disinfecting solutions.一种评估隐形眼镜及其镜盒与隐形眼镜消毒剂相容性的新方法。
Eye Contact Lens. 2012 Jan;38(1):53-62. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3182411fba.
6
Reduction of disinfection efficacy of contact lens care products on the global market in the presence of contact lenses and cases.接触镜和病例存在的情况下全球市场接触镜护理产品消毒效果降低
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000955.
7
Cytotoxicity and antimicrobial activity of six multipurpose soft contact lens disinfecting solutions.六种多功能软性隐形眼镜消毒溶液的细胞毒性和抗菌活性
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006 Sep;26(5):476-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00393.x.
8
The comparison of antimicrobial effectiveness of contact lens solutions.隐形眼镜护理液抗菌效果的比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;37(5):1103-1114. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0375-4. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
9
Antimicrobial Efficacy of Multipurpose Disinfecting Solutions in the Presence of Contact Lenses and Lens Cases.接触镜和镜盒存在时多用途消毒溶液的抗菌效果。
Eye Contact Lens. 2018 Mar;44(2):125-131. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000308.
10
Contact lens disinfecting solutions antibacterial efficacy: comparison between clinical isolates and the standard ISO ATCC strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus.接触镜消毒溶液的抗菌功效:临床分离株与绿脓假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的标准 ISO ATCC 菌株的比较。
Eye (Lond). 2012 Feb;26(2):327-30. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.284. Epub 2011 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
In-vitro analysis of the microbicidal activity of 6 contact lens care solutions.体外分析 6 种接触镜护理液的杀菌活性。
BMC Infect Dis. 2012 Oct 3;12:241. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-241.