Prenat Diagn. 1999 Jan;19(1):29-35.
Different origins for trisomy 15 mosaicism confined to the placenta have been suggested. We have analysed the data on trisomy 15 mosaicism in EUCROMIC. Trisomy 15 mosaicism or non-mosaic feto-placental discrepancy on CVS was registered in 0.027 per cent of samples karyotyped (34/126 465): 28/34 had confined placental mosaicism (CPM), 1/34 was probably true fetal mosaicism and 5/34 could not be classified. In 17 of the 28 pregnancies with CPM, cytogenetic information existed on both cytotrophoblast lineage (direct CVS preparation or short-term incubation) and extra-embryonic mesoderm, EEM (villus culture): CPM was of type I (restricted to the cytotrophoblast) in 5/17 (29 per cent); type II (restricted to the EEM) in 4/17 (24 per cent) and type III (both cytotrophoblast and EEM) in 8/17 (47 per cent). Testing for uniparental disomy (UPD) for chromosome 15 in the fetus or child was done in nine cases, showing upd(15)mat in 1/9, and biparental inheritance in 8/9. Upd(15)mat, clinically diagnosed due to Prader Willi syndrome, but without DNA analysis, was registered in one additional liveborn child. Analysis of these 17 cases, in conjunction with 10 similar reports in the literature also having cytogenetic data from both cell lineages, indicates two categories of trisomy 15 CPM. One has a high proportion of trisomic cells, often with a type III distribution, and an observed high risk of UPD and adverse pregnancy outcome. The second has lower proportions of trisomic cells, primarily of type I or II distribution, and a lower empirical risk of UPD or pregnancy loss. Based on this cytogenetic analysis, supported by the available DNA data, we suggest that, in contrast to trisomy 16 CPM, the trisomic cell line originates from a meiotic error in only about 50 per cent of cases of trisomy 15 CPM, the rest being the result of post-zygotic, mitotic non-disjunction. Despite this, we recommend amniocentesis following the finding of a mosaic or non-mosaic trisomy 15 by CVS, in order to exclude both UPD and potential true fetal mosaicism.
已有研究提出局限于胎盘的15号染色体三体性嵌合体存在不同的起源。我们分析了EUCROMIC研究中关于15号染色体三体性嵌合体的数据。在进行核型分析的样本中,15号染色体三体性嵌合体或绒毛取样(CVS)时出现的非嵌合型胎儿 - 胎盘差异占0.027%(34/126465):34例中,28例为局限型胎盘嵌合体(CPM),1例可能为真正的胎儿嵌合体,5例无法分类。在28例CPM妊娠中,有17例同时有关于细胞滋养层谱系(直接CVS制片或短期培养)和胚外中胚层(EEM,绒毛培养)的细胞遗传学信息:17例中,5例(29%)为I型CPM(局限于细胞滋养层);4例(24%)为II型(局限于EEM);8例(47%)为III型(细胞滋养层和EEM均有)。对9例胎儿或儿童进行了15号染色体单亲二倍体(UPD)检测,其中1/9显示为母源upd(15),8/9为双亲遗传。另外有1例活产儿临床诊断为普拉德 - 威利综合征但未进行DNA分析,登记为母源upd(15)。对这17例病例进行分析,并结合文献中另外10篇有两个细胞谱系细胞遗传学数据的类似报道,表明15号染色体CPM可分为两类。一类三体细胞比例高,常为III型分布,且观察到UPD风险高及不良妊娠结局风险高。另一类三体细胞比例低,主要为I型或II型分布,UPD或妊娠丢失的经验风险较低。基于此细胞遗传学分析,并得到现有DNA数据支持,我们认为,与16号染色体CPM不同,在15号染色体CPM病例中,约50%的三体细胞系起源于减数分裂错误,其余为合子后有丝分裂不分离的结果。尽管如此,我们建议在CVS检测发现嵌合型或非嵌合型15号染色体三体后进行羊水穿刺,以排除UPD和潜在的真正胎儿嵌合体。