Trapnell P D, Campbell J D
Department of Psychology, Ohio State University at Mansfield 44906, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Feb;76(2):284-304. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.2.284.
A distinction between ruminative and reflective types of private self-attentiveness is introduced and evaluated with respect to L. R. Goldberg's (1982) list of 1,710 English trait adjectives (Study 1), the five-factor model of personality (FFM) and A. Fenigstein, M. F. Scheier, and A. Buss's (1975) Self-Consciousness Scales (Study 2), and previously reported correlates and effects of private self-consciousness (PrSC; Studies 3 and 4). Results suggest that the PrSC scale confounds two unrelated, motivationally distinct dispositions--rumination and reflection--and that this confounding may account for the "self-absorption paradox" implicit in PrSC research findings: Higher PrSC scores are associated with more accurate and extensive self-knowledge yet higher levels of psychological distress. The potential of the FFM to provide a comprehensive framework for conceptualizing self-attentive dispositions, and to order and integrate research findings within this domain, is discussed.
本文引入了沉思型和反思型两种内省自我专注类型,并根据L. R. 戈德堡(1982)列出的1710个英语特质形容词清单(研究1)、人格五因素模型(FFM)以及A. 费尼斯坦、M. F. 谢尔和A. 布斯(1975)的自我意识量表(研究2),以及先前报道的内省自我意识(PrSC)的相关因素和影响(研究3和4)对其进行了评估。结果表明,PrSC量表混淆了两种不相关、动机上不同的倾向——沉思和反思——这种混淆可能解释了PrSC研究结果中隐含的“自我专注悖论”:较高的PrSC分数与更准确、更广泛的自我认知相关,但同时也与更高水平的心理困扰相关。本文还讨论了FFM为内省自我专注倾向概念化提供全面框架,以及在此领域内整理和整合研究结果的潜力。