Vos M A, Golitsyn S R, Stangl K, Ruda M Y, Van Wijk L V, Harry J D, Perry K T, Touboul P, Steinbeck G, Wellens H J
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Maastricht, Netherlands.
Heart. 1998 Jun;79(6):568-75. doi: 10.1136/hrt.79.6.568.
To compare the efficacy and safety of a single dose of ibutilide, a new class III antiarrhythmic drug, with that of DL-sotalol in terminating chronic atrial fibrillation or flutter in haemodynamically stable patients.
Double blind, randomised study.
43 European hospitals.
308 patients (mean age 60 years, 70% men, 48% with heart disease) with sustained atrial fibrillation (n = 251) or atrial flutter (n = 57) (duration three hours to 45 days) were randomised to three groups to receive a 10 minute infusion of 1 mg ibutilide (n = 99), 2 mg ibutilide (n = 106), or 1.5 mg/kg DL-sotalol (n = 103). Infusion was discontinued at termination of the arrhythmia.
Successful conversion of atrial fibrillation or flutter, defined as termination of arrhythmia within one hour of treatment.
Both drugs were more effective against atrial flutter than against atrial fibrillation. Ibutilide was superior to DL-sotalol for treating atrial flutter (70% and 56% v 19%), while the high dose of ibutilide was more effective for treating atrial fibrillation than DL-sotalol (44% v 11%) and the lower dose of ibutilide (44% v 20%, p < 0.01). The mean (SD) time to arrhythmia termination was 13 (7) minutes with 2 mg ibutilide, 19 (15) minutes with 1 mg ibutilide, and 25 (17) minutes with DL-sotalol. In all patients, the duration of arrhythmia before treatment was a predictor of arrhythmia termination, although this was less obvious in the group that received 2 mg ibutilide. This dose converted almost 48% of atrial fibrillation that was present for more than 30 days. Concomitant use of digitalis or nifedipine and prolongation of the QTc interval were not predictive of arrhythmia termination. Bradycardia (6.5%) and hypotension (3.7%) were more common side effects with DL-sotalol. Of 211 patients given ibutilide, two (0.9%) who received the higher dose developed polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, one of whom required direct current cardioversion.
Ibutilide (given in 1 or 2 mg doses over 10 minutes) is highly effective for rapidly terminating persistent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. This new class III drug, under monitored conditions, is a potential alternative to currently available cardioversion options.
比较新型Ⅲ类抗心律失常药物单剂量伊布利特与索他洛尔终止血流动力学稳定患者慢性房颤或房扑的疗效和安全性。
双盲、随机研究。
43家欧洲医院。
308例持续性房颤(n = 251)或房扑(n = 57)(持续时间3小时至45天)患者(平均年龄60岁,70%为男性,48%患有心脏病)被随机分为三组,分别接受10分钟静脉输注1mg伊布利特(n = 99)、2mg伊布利特(n = 106)或1.5mg/kg索他洛尔(n = 103)。心律失常终止时停止输注。
房颤或房扑成功转复,定义为治疗1小时内心律失常终止。
两种药物对房扑的疗效均优于房颤。伊布利特治疗房扑优于索他洛尔(70%和56%比19%),而高剂量伊布利特治疗房颤比索他洛尔更有效(44%比11%),且比低剂量伊布利特更有效(44%比20%,p < 0.01)。心律失常终止的平均(标准差)时间为:2mg伊布利特组13(7)分钟,1mg伊布利特组19(15)分钟,索他洛尔组25(17)分钟。在所有患者中,治疗前心律失常的持续时间是心律失常终止的一个预测因素,尽管在接受2mg伊布利特的组中不太明显。该剂量可转复近48%持续超过30天的房颤。同时使用洋地黄或硝苯地平和QTc间期延长不是心律失常终止的预测因素。心动过缓(6.5%)和低血压(3.7%)是索他洛尔更常见的副作用。在211例接受伊布利特治疗的患者中,2例(0.9%)接受高剂量治疗的患者发生多形性室性心动过速,其中1例需要直流电复律。
伊布利特(10分钟内给予1或2mg剂量)对快速终止持续性房颤或房扑非常有效。这种新型Ⅲ类药物在监测条件下是目前可用复律方法的一种潜在替代药物。