Cattell M J, Knowles J C, Clarke R L, Lynch E
Department of Conservative Dentistry, St. Bartholomew's, London, UK.
J Dent. 1999 Mar;27(3):183-96. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(98)00047-5.
The biaxial flexural strength of Optimal pressable ceramics and IPS Empress pressable ceramics were tested, compared and the micro-structures and compositions explored. The materials evaluated were Optimal shaded (Opcs) and unshaded (Opcus) ceramics and IPS Empress shaded (Ems) and unshaded (Emus) ceramics. Twenty-one disc specimens per material were prepared, heat-treated and tested. The piston on three-ball test ASTM F394-78 (1991) was used to test the specimens in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.15 mm/min. Specimens were viewed in a scanning electron microscope and X-ray diffraction used to determine the phases present. Mean strengths (MPa +/- SD) were: Ems 120.1 +/- 20.5, Emus 135.8 +/- 16.0, Opcs 139.1 +/- 14.3 and Opcus 138.0 +/- 11.5. There was no statistically significant difference between Optimal shaded, Optimal unshaded and Empress unshaded strength values (p > 0.05). Empress shaded strength values were significantly lower than the other materials tested (p < 0.05). Weibull analysis provided m values: Ems 6.1, Emus 10.2, Opcs 12.8 and Opcus 13.9 and 1% and 5% probabilities of failure. Secondary electron imaging revealed a dense dispersal of leucite crystals in the glassy matrix of the Optimal ceramics of an average size 5.5 +/- 9.7 micron 2 for the Optimal shaded ceramic and 6.6 +/- 13.3 micron 2 for the Optimal unshaded ceramic. Leucite crystal agglomerates were evident for the Empress shaded material and a uniform distribution of fine leucite crystals (1.9 +/- 1.8 micron 2) for the Empress unshaded ceramic. Crystal and matrix microcracking were present in most of the material microstructures, together with porosity and tabular alumina platelets in the Optimal ceramics. X-ray diffraction revealed the presence of tetragonal leucite and small amounts of cubic leucite. Optimal ceramics and Empress unshaded ceramic provided higher strength and Weibull m values compared with Empress shaded ceramic. Inherent material defects were characterised and cubic leucite was identified.
对Optimal可压铸陶瓷和IPS Empress可压铸陶瓷的双轴弯曲强度进行了测试、比较,并对其微观结构和成分进行了探究。所评估的材料包括Optimal着色(Opcs)和未着色(Opcus)陶瓷以及IPS Empress着色(Ems)和未着色(Emus)陶瓷。每种材料制备了21个圆盘试样,进行热处理和测试。使用符合ASTM F394 - 78(1991)标准的三球试验活塞,在万能试验机上以0.15毫米/分钟的十字头速度对试样进行测试。在扫描电子显微镜下观察试样,并使用X射线衍射确定存在的相。平均强度(MPa±标准差)分别为:Ems 120.1±20.5,Emus 135.8±16.0,Opcs 139.1±14.3,Opcus 138.0±11.5。Optimal着色、Optimal未着色和Empress未着色的强度值之间无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。Empress着色的强度值显著低于其他测试材料(p<0.05)。威布尔分析得出的m值为:Ems 6.1,Emus 10.2,Opcs 12.8,Opcus 13.9以及1%和5%的失效概率。二次电子成像显示,Optimal陶瓷的玻璃基体中白榴石晶体密集分布,Optimal着色陶瓷的平均尺寸为5.5±9.7微米²,Optimal未着色陶瓷的平均尺寸为6.6±13.3微米²。Empress着色材料中白榴石晶体团聚明显,Empress未着色陶瓷中细白榴石晶体(1.9±1.8微米²)分布均匀。大多数材料微观结构中存在晶体和基体微裂纹,Optimal陶瓷中还存在孔隙和片状氧化铝片晶。X射线衍射显示存在四方白榴石和少量立方白榴石。与Empress着色陶瓷相比,Optimal陶瓷和Empress未着色陶瓷具有更高的强度和威布尔m值。对材料固有的缺陷进行了表征,并鉴定出了立方白榴石。