Suppr超能文献

发作期单光子发射计算机断层扫描定位经同步颅内脑电图验证。

Periictal SPECT localization verified by simultaneous intracranial EEG.

作者信息

Spanaki M V, Zubal I G, MacMullan J, Spencer S S

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8018, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 1999 Mar;40(3):267-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb00703.x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We investigated whether blood-flow changes measured by ictal or immediate postictal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) reflect with accuracy the actual location of ictal discharge as measured by simultaneous intracranial EEG. In addition, we evaluated the reliability of ictal SPECT obtained with implanted electrodes by comparing results with those of ictal SPECT performed during scalp EEG monitoring in selected patients.

METHODS

Eleven patients with intractable partial epilepsy who had both ictal and interictal SPECT scans during invasive EEG monitoring were studied. We analyzed perfusion differences based on registration, normalization, and subtraction of periictal and interictal SPECT images. SPECT results were interpreted in relation to location and evolution of ictal EEG change, as reflected by simultaneous intracranial EEG. In five patients, we also compared ictal SPECT results that were obtained during both scalp and intracranial EEG monitoring.

RESULTS

In 10 of 11 patients, localized increases or decreases in blood flow or both were identified in regions of ongoing or prior seizure discharge, respectively, at the time of SPECT brain perfusion. In one patient, SPECT localization could not be verified by the available electrode array.

CONCLUSIONS

Localization of ictal discharge during or before SPECT injection accurately determines increase or decrease in perfusion, respectively, and both are of equal validity in reflecting the region of epileptic discharge. SPECT perfusion changes can be reliably obtained during intracranial monitoring.

摘要

目的

我们研究了发作期或发作后即刻单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)测量的血流变化是否能准确反映同步颅内脑电图测量的发作期放电的实际位置。此外,我们通过比较选定患者在头皮脑电图监测期间进行的发作期SPECT结果与植入电极获得的发作期SPECT结果,评估了植入电极获得的发作期SPECT的可靠性。

方法

对11例难治性部分性癫痫患者进行了研究,这些患者在侵入性脑电图监测期间进行了发作期和发作间期SPECT扫描。我们基于发作期和发作间期SPECT图像的配准、归一化和相减分析灌注差异。根据同步颅内脑电图反映的发作期脑电图变化的位置和演变来解释SPECT结果。在5例患者中,我们还比较了头皮和颅内脑电图监测期间获得的发作期SPECT结果。

结果

11例患者中有10例在SPECT脑灌注时,在正在发作或先前发作放电的区域分别发现了局部血流增加或减少或两者都有。1例患者的SPECT定位无法通过可用的电极阵列进行验证。

结论

SPECT注射期间或之前发作期放电的定位分别准确地确定了灌注的增加或减少,两者在反映癫痫放电区域方面具有同等的有效性。在颅内监测期间可以可靠地获得SPECT灌注变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验