Hulka B S, Kupper L L, Cassel J C
Am J Public Health. 1976 Dec;66(12):1173-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.66.12.1173.
Minimal explicit consensus criteria in the management of patients with four indicator conditions were established by an ad hoc committee of primary care physicians practicing in different locations. These criteria were then applied to the practices of primary care physicians located in a single community by abstracting medical records and obtaining questionnaire data about patients with the indicator conditions. A standardized management score for each physician was used as the dependent variable in stepwise regression analysis with physician/practice and patient/disease characteristics as the candidate independent variables. For all physicians combined, the mean management scores were high, ranging from .78 to .93 for the four conditions. For two of the conditions, care of the normal infant and pregnant woman, the management scores were better for pediatricians and obstetricians respectively than for family physicians. For the other two conditions, adult onset diabetes and congestive heart failure, there were no differences between the management scores of family physicians and internists. Patient/disease characteristics did not contribute significantly to explaining the variation in the standardized management scores.
由在不同地点执业的基层医疗医生组成的特别委员会制定了针对四种指标疾病患者管理的最低明确共识标准。然后,通过提取病历并获取有关指标疾病患者的问卷数据,将这些标准应用于位于单一社区的基层医疗医生的诊疗实践中。在逐步回归分析中,将每位医生的标准化管理得分用作因变量,将医生/诊疗实践和患者/疾病特征用作候选自变量。对于所有医生而言,综合管理得分较高,四种疾病的得分范围为0.78至0.93。对于其中两种疾病,即正常婴儿护理和孕妇护理,儿科医生和产科医生的管理得分分别优于家庭医生。对于另外两种疾病,即成人发病型糖尿病和充血性心力衰竭,家庭医生和内科医生的管理得分没有差异。患者/疾病特征对解释标准化管理得分的差异没有显著贡献。