Suppr超能文献

低血糖的对抗调节反应因胰岛素给药途径而异,但不影响正常人的葡萄糖生成。

Counterregulatory response to hypoglycemia differs according to the insulin delivery route, but does not affect glucose production in normal humans.

作者信息

Lewis G F, Carpentier A, Bilinski D, Giacca A, Vranic M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Mar;84(3):1037-46. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.3.5539.

Abstract

The magnitude of the counterregulatory response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia is primarily determined by the degree of hypoglycemia. We examined whether the route of acute insulin delivery (portal or peripheral venous) is also important in determining the magnitude of the counterregulatory response to hypoglycemia in nine healthy nondiabetic men. Pancreatic insulin secretion, stimulated by an i.v. tolbutamide infusion (portal insulin study), was matched with an exogenous insulin infusion into the peripheral vein 4-6 weeks later (peripheral insulin study). Each study consisted of a 150-min baseline tracer equilibration period, a 180-min euglycemic hyperinsulinemic (portal or peripheral insulin delivery) period, a 60-min hypoglycemic period in which insulin secretion diminished during tolbutamide or was reduced during exogenous insulin, and a 30-min recovery period. Peripheral venous glucose concentrations were well matched in the portal and peripheral studies during euglycemia and hypoglycemia (glucose nadir, 2.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/L in the portal and 2.7 +/- 0.1 mmol/L in the peripheral; mean +/- SEM; P = NS), and insulin concentrations were about 1.5-fold higher throughout the experiment in the peripheral vs. the portal insulin study due to the first pass extraction of insulin in the portal study. There was a much greater increment (P < 0.0001) in FFA in the portal vs. the peripheral study (area under the curve: portal, 19.5 +/- 3.9 mmol/L x 90 min; peripheral, 3.3 +/- 1.1 mmol/L x 90 min), whereas plasma glucagon and GH were higher in the peripheral study (P = 0.01 for glucagon; P = 0.015 for GH). There was no significant difference between studies in epinephrine and norepinephrine responses to hypoglycemia or stimulation of endogenous glucose production (area under the curve: portal, 636 +/- 103 micromol/kg x 90 min; peripheral, 705 +/- 69 micromol/kg x 90 min; P = NS). In summary, we have shown that the glucagon, GH, and FFA responses to hypoglycemia during insulin dissipation are affected by the route of insulin delivery and are not controlled exclusively by the nadir blood glucose level. The clinical importance of these observations in diabetic subjects as they relate to route of insulin delivery (portal or peripheral) during insulin dissipation remains to be determined.

摘要

对胰岛素诱导的低血糖的对抗调节反应的强度主要由低血糖的程度决定。我们研究了急性胰岛素给药途径(门静脉或外周静脉)在决定9名健康非糖尿病男性对低血糖的对抗调节反应强度方面是否也很重要。通过静脉注射甲苯磺丁脲输注刺激的胰腺胰岛素分泌(门静脉胰岛素研究),在4 - 6周后与外周静脉注射外源性胰岛素相匹配(外周胰岛素研究)。每项研究包括一个150分钟的基线示踪剂平衡期、一个180分钟的血糖正常高胰岛素血症期(门静脉或外周胰岛素给药)、一个60分钟的低血糖期,在此期间甲苯磺丁脲期间胰岛素分泌减少或外源性胰岛素期间胰岛素分泌减少,以及一个30分钟的恢复期。在血糖正常和低血糖期间,门静脉和外周研究中的外周静脉葡萄糖浓度匹配良好(血糖最低点:门静脉为2.9±0.1 mmol/L,外周为2.7±0.1 mmol/L;平均值±标准误;P = 无显著性差异),并且由于门静脉研究中胰岛素的首过提取,在整个实验中外周胰岛素研究中的胰岛素浓度比门静脉胰岛素研究中的高约1.5倍。与外周研究相比,门静脉研究中游离脂肪酸的增加幅度更大(P < 0.0001)(曲线下面积:门静脉,19.5±3.9 mmol/L×90分钟;外周,3.3±1.1 mmol/L×90分钟),而外周研究中血浆胰高血糖素和生长激素更高(胰高血糖素P = 0.01;生长激素P = 0.015)。在肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素对低血糖的反应或内源性葡萄糖生成的刺激方面,研究之间没有显著差异(曲线下面积:门静脉,636±103 μmol/kg×90分钟;外周,705±69 μmol/kg×90分钟;P = 无显著性差异)。总之,我们已经表明,胰岛素消散期间对低血糖的胰高血糖素、生长激素和游离脂肪酸反应受胰岛素给药途径的影响,并非仅由最低血糖水平控制。这些观察结果在糖尿病患者中与胰岛素消散期间胰岛素给药途径(门静脉或外周)相关的临床重要性仍有待确定。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验