NAGLE GN, FAHEY TJ, LASSOIE JP
U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Aquatic/Lands Interaction Program, 3200 Jefferson Way, Corvallis, Oregon 97330, USA
Environ Manage. 1999 May;23(4):441-452. doi: 10.1007/s002679900199.
/ The sedimentation of reservoirs is a serious problem throughout the tropics, yet most attempts to control sedimentation in large river basins have not been very successful. Reliable information on erosion rates and sources of sediments has been lacking. In regions where geologically unstable terrain combines with high rainfall, natural erosion rates might be so high that the effects of human activity are limited. Estimates of natural erosion in these situations often have been poor because of the episodic nature of most erosion during large storms and because mass-wasting may supply much of the sediment. The predominance of mass-wasting in some watersheds can result in an unexpectedly high ratio of bedload to suspended load, shifting sedimentation to "live" rather than "dead" storage within reservoirs. Furthermore, the inappropriate use of the Universal Soil Loss Equation to assess the effectiveness of erosion control measures has led to inaccurate estimates of the sediment reduction benefits that could accrue to watershed treatment efforts. Although reducing erosion from cultivated areas is desirable for other reasons, efforts aimed at reducing reservoir sedimentation by controlling agricultural sources of erosion may have limited benefits if the principal sources are of natural origin or are associated with construction of the dams and reservoirs and with rural roads and trails. Finally, the most appropriate locations for watershed rehabilitation depend on the magnitude of temporary storage of colluvium and alluvium within the river basin: Where storage volume is large and residence time of sediment very long, reducing agricultural erosion may have limited impacts on sedimentation within the expected life of a reservoir. Systematic development and analysis of sediment budgets for representative watersheds is needed to address these limitations and thereby improve both the planning of river basin development schemes and the allocation of resources towards reducing sedimentation. When sedimentation of reservoirs is the key issue, sediment budgets must focus especially on channel transport rates and sediment delivery from hillsides. Sediment budgets are especially critical for tropical areas where project funds and technical help are limited. Once sediment budgets are available, watershed managers will be able to direct erosion control programs towards locations where they will be most effective. KEY WORDS: Tropical watersheds; Sedimentation; Reservoirs; Erosion control
水库淤积是整个热带地区面临的一个严重问题,但大多数控制大型河流流域淤积的尝试都不太成功。一直缺乏关于侵蚀速率和沉积物来源的可靠信息。在地质不稳定地形与高降雨量相结合的地区,自然侵蚀速率可能非常高,以至于人类活动的影响有限。由于大多数侵蚀在大风暴期间具有突发性,而且大规模山体滑坡可能提供了大部分沉积物,因此在这些情况下对自然侵蚀的估计往往很差。在一些流域,大规模山体滑坡占主导地位可能导致推移质与悬移质的比例意外地高,从而使水库内的淤积从“死”库容转移到“活”库容。此外,不恰当地使用通用土壤流失方程来评估侵蚀控制措施的有效性,导致对流域治理努力可能带来的沉积物减少效益的估计不准确。虽然出于其他原因减少耕地侵蚀是可取的,但如果主要沉积物来源是自然源或与大坝和水库建设以及农村道路和小径有关,那么通过控制农业侵蚀源来减少水库淤积的努力可能收效有限。最后,流域恢复的最合适地点取决于流域内崩积层和冲积层的临时存储量:在存储量大且沉积物停留时间很长的地方,减少农业侵蚀对水库预期寿命内的淤积可能影响有限。需要对代表性流域的沉积物收支进行系统的开发和分析,以解决这些限制,从而改善流域开发计划的规划以及减少淤积的资源分配。当水库淤积是关键问题时,沉积物收支必须特别关注河道输沙率和山坡的泥沙输送。沉积物收支对于项目资金和技术援助有限的热带地区尤为重要。一旦有了沉积物收支数据,流域管理者就能将侵蚀控制项目指向最有效的地点。关键词:热带流域;淤积;水库;侵蚀控制