Chen M L, Mao I F, Lin I K
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sci Total Environ. 1999 Feb 9;226(2-3):227-35. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00407-0.
This study conducted an atmospheric aerosol sampling to measure the PM10 (particles < 10 microns in aerodynamic diameter) and PM2.5 (particles < 2.5 microns in aerodynamic diameter) mass concentrations from October 1996 to June 1997 in northern (Taipei), central (Taichung) and southern (Kaohsiung), the three largest cities of Taiwan. Seventy-eight samples were obtained to measure the mass concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 from nine sampling sites. According to those results, the PM10 mass concentrations in Taipei, Taichung and Kaohsiung were 42.19, 60.99 and 77.10 micrograms/m3, respectively. The corresponding PM2.5 mass concentrations were 23.09, 39.97 and 48.47 micrograms/m3, respectively. The PM2.5 fraction accounted for 61-67% of the PM10 mass in central and southern Taiwan, but was lower (54-59%) in northern Taiwan. Some samples in which the PM2.5 fraction was overwhelmingly dominant could reach as high as 80-95% of the PM10 mass. In addition, the PM2.5, PM10 levels and PM2.5/PM10-2.5 (particles with aerodynamic diameters ranging from 2.5 to 10 microns) ratios in metropolitan Taiwan significantly fluctuated from site-to-site and over time. Moreover, ambient daily PM2.5 and PM10-2.5 mass concentrations did not correlate well with each other at most of the sampling sites, indicated that they originated from different kinds of sources and emitted variedly over time.
本研究于1996年10月至1997年6月在台湾三大城市的北部(台北)、中部(台中)和南部(高雄)进行了大气气溶胶采样,以测量空气动力学直径小于10微米的颗粒物(PM10)和空气动力学直径小于2.5微米的颗粒物(PM2.5)的质量浓度。从9个采样点获取了78个样本,用于测量PM10和PM2.5的质量浓度。根据这些结果,台北、台中、高雄的PM10质量浓度分别为42.19、60.99和77.10微克/立方米。相应的PM2.5质量浓度分别为23.09、39.97和48.47微克/立方米。在台湾中部和南部,PM2.5占PM10质量的61%-67%,但在台湾北部较低(54%-59%)。一些PM2.5占压倒性主导地位的样本中,PM2.5质量可高达PM10质量的80%-95%。此外,台湾大都市地区的PM2.5、PM10水平以及PM2.5/PM10-2.5(空气动力学直径在2.5至10微米之间的颗粒物)比值在不同采样点和不同时间有显著波动。而且,在大多数采样点,环境中每日的PM2.5和PM10-2.5质量浓度之间的相关性不佳,这表明它们来自不同类型的源,且随时间变化的排放情况各异。