Hollerbach S, Fitzpatrick D, Shine G, Kamath M V, Upton A R, Tougas G
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 1999 Feb;11(1):37-46. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2982.1999.00132.x.
Evoked potential studies provide an objective measure of the neural pathways involved with perception. The effects of cognitive factors, such as anticipation or awareness, on evoked potentials are not known. The aim was to compare the evoked potential response to oesophageal stimulation with the cortical activity associated with anticipation of the same stimulus. In 12 healthy men (23.5 +/- 4 years), oesophageal electrical stimulation (15 mA, 0.2 Hz, 0.2 msec) was applied, and the evoked potentials recorded using scalp electrodes. A computerized model of randomly skipped stimuli (4:1 ratio) was used to separately record the evoked potentials associated with stimulation and those associated with an anticipated stimulus. The electrical stimulus represented the nontarget stimulus and the skipped impulse the target (anticipatory) stimulus. This anticipatory evoked potential was also compared to auditory P300 evoked potentials. Reproducible evoked potentials and auditory P300 responses were elicited in all subjects. Anticipatory evoked potentials (peak latency 282.1 +/- 7.9 msec, amplitude 8.2 +/- 0.7 microV, P < 0.05 vs auditory P300 evoked potential) were obtained with the skipped stimulus. This anticipatory evoked potential was located frontocentrally, while the auditory P300 potential was located in the centro-parietal cortex. The anticipatory evoked potential associated with expectation of an oesophageal stimulus, although of similar latency to that of the auditory P300 evoked response, originates from a different cortical location. The recording of cognitive evoked potentials to an expected oesophageal stimulus depends on attention to, and awareness of, the actual stimulus. Anticipatory evoked potentials to GI stimuli may provide an objective electrophysiological tool for the assessment of the cognitive factors associated with visceral perception.
诱发电位研究为涉及感知的神经通路提供了一种客观测量方法。认知因素,如预期或意识,对诱发电位的影响尚不清楚。目的是比较食管刺激诱发的电位反应与同一刺激预期相关的皮层活动。对12名健康男性(23.5±4岁)施加食管电刺激(15毫安,0.2赫兹,0.2毫秒),并使用头皮电极记录诱发电位。采用随机跳过刺激的计算机模型(4:1比例)分别记录与刺激相关的诱发电位和与预期刺激相关的诱发电位。电刺激代表非目标刺激,跳过的脉冲代表目标(预期)刺激。这种预期诱发电位也与听觉P300诱发电位进行了比较。所有受试者均引出了可重复的诱发电位和听觉P300反应。对于跳过的刺激,获得了预期诱发电位(峰潜伏期282.1±7.9毫秒,波幅8.2±0.7微伏,与听觉P300诱发电位相比P<0.05)。这种预期诱发电位位于额中央,而听觉P300电位位于中央顶叶皮层。与食管刺激预期相关的预期诱发电位,尽管潜伏期与听觉P300诱发反应相似,但起源于不同的皮层位置。对预期食管刺激的认知诱发电位记录取决于对实际刺激的关注和意识。对胃肠道刺激的预期诱发电位可能为评估与内脏感知相关的认知因素提供一种客观的电生理工具。