Suppr超能文献

胺碘酮与心脏性猝死的“一级”预防:十年临床试验的批判性综述

Amiodarone and "primary" prevention of sudden death: critical review of a decade of clinical trials.

作者信息

Farré J, Romero J, Rubio J M, Ayala R, Castro-Dorticós J

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1999 Mar 11;83(5B):55D-63D. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)01027-3.

Abstract

Several trials have evaluated the role of amiodarone in decreasing mortality in patients at high risk of developing sudden death. Current evidence does not support the prophylactic use of amiodarone in myocardial infarction (MI) survivors with a depressed left ventricular function and/or frequent or complex ventricular ectopy. Some postinfarction trials (e.g., the Spanish Study of Sudden Death [SSSD]) found mortality rates in controls much lower than the expected figures. Other postinfarction trials--the European Amiodarone Myocardial Infarction Arrhythmia Trial (EMIAT) and the Canadian Amiodarone Myocardial Infarction Arrhythmia Trial (CAMIAT)--despite observing a 2-year mortality rate of about 15% as expected, could not demonstrate a significant reduction in mortality. Amiodarone decreases the risk of sudden death in postinfarction patients by about 35%. In patients with a history of heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction, evidence is not sufficiently strong to use amiodarone for prevention of sudden death. The 2 major trials on such patients, Group for the Study of Survival in Heart Failure in Argentina (Grupo de Estudio de la Sobrevida en la Insuficiencia Cardiaca en Argentina or GESICA) and the Survival Trial of Antiarrhythmic Therapy in Congestive Heart Failure (STAT-CHF), arrived at conflicting results. Meta-analyses have been performed to overcome the small sample size of these trials, with the aim of assessing the benefit of amiodarone on total mortality. Differences among the recruited populations make it difficult to extract clinically applicable conclusions from these overviews. Even accepting that amiodarone might decrease total mortality by 10%, it is difficult to identify the patients for whom such a beneficial effect applies. A practical consequence of amiodarone trials is that this drug can be used rather safely in patients with left ventricular dysfunction of any etiology as, in contrast to some class I agents, it does not increase mortality. Therefore, amiodarone is the drug of choice when antiarrhythmic drug treatment is indicated in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

摘要

多项试验评估了胺碘酮在降低有猝死高风险患者死亡率方面的作用。目前的证据不支持在左心室功能不全和/或频发或复杂室性早搏的心肌梗死(MI)幸存者中预防性使用胺碘酮。一些心肌梗死后试验(如西班牙猝死研究[SSSD])发现,对照组的死亡率远低于预期数字。其他心肌梗死后试验——欧洲胺碘酮心肌梗死心律失常试验(EMIAT)和加拿大胺碘酮心肌梗死心律失常试验(CAMIAT)——尽管观察到2年死亡率约为预期的15%,但未能证明死亡率有显著降低。胺碘酮可使心肌梗死后患者的猝死风险降低约35%。在有心力衰竭和左心室功能障碍病史的患者中,使用胺碘酮预防猝死的证据不够充分。关于此类患者的两项主要试验,阿根廷心力衰竭生存研究组(Grupo de Estudio de la Sobrevida en la Insuficiencia Cardiaca en Argentina或GESICA)和充血性心力衰竭抗心律失常治疗生存试验(STAT-CHF),得出了相互矛盾的结果。已进行荟萃分析以克服这些试验样本量小的问题,目的是评估胺碘酮对总死亡率的益处。所纳入人群之间的差异使得难以从这些综述中得出临床适用的结论。即使接受胺碘酮可能使总死亡率降低10%,也很难确定哪些患者能从中受益。胺碘酮试验的一个实际结果是,与某些I类药物不同,这种药物在任何病因导致的左心室功能障碍患者中使用相当安全,不会增加死亡率。因此,当对左心室功能障碍患者进行抗心律失常药物治疗时,胺碘酮是首选药物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验