Juhás T, Kozák I, Augustinský B
Ocná klinika LF UPJS a FNsP, Kosice.
Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 1999 Jan;55(1):14-20.
The aim of this work is to compare results of the correction of hyperopia by method of hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (HPRK) with method of laser assisted keratomileusis known as LASIK. We evaluate group of 129 eyes operated by excimer laser Keracor 117 manufactured by Technolas company. 77 eyes underwent HPRK and 52 eyes hyperopic LASIK (HLASIK). The patients were divided to two groups, the first of which comprised 47 eyes with low hyperopia to +3.5 Dsph and the second 82 eyes with high hyperopia. Follow-up period was 12 months results were statistically evaluated by Student t-test. One year after treatment, in the first group was 62% eyes with hyperopia to +1.0 Dsph after HPRK and 70% after HLASIK. In the second group it was 32% and 44%, respectively. No statistically significant differences have been found between the two groups. In spite of that, we consider HLASIK method better than HPRK from the point of view of stability of results, occurrence of complications and estimated resulting refraction, especially in the eyes with low hyperopia.
这项工作的目的是比较采用远视性准分子原位角膜磨镶术（HPRK）与被称为LASIK的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术矫正远视的效果。我们评估了由Technolas公司生产的Keracor 117准分子激光手术的129只眼睛。77只眼睛接受了HPRK手术，52只眼睛接受了远视性LASIK（HLASIK）手术。患者被分为两组，第一组包括47只低度远视（至+3.5 Dsph）的眼睛，第二组包括82只高度远视的眼睛。随访期为12个月，结果采用学生t检验进行统计学评估。治疗一年后，第一组中，HPRK术后有62%的眼睛远视度数降至+1.0 Dsph，HLASIK术后为70%。第二组中，这一比例分别为32%和44%。两组之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。尽管如此，从结果稳定性、并发症发生率和预估屈光结果来看，我们认为HLASIK方法优于HPRK，尤其是在低度远视眼中。
