Ros D, Espinosa M, Setoain J F, Falcón C, Lomeña F J, Pavía J
Laboratori de Biofísica i Bioenginyeria, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.
Nucl Med Commun. 1999 Mar;20(3):227-36. doi: 10.1097/00006231-199903000-00005.
Five functions of merit were used for the registration of 99Tcm-HMPAO brain SPET studies. The correlation coefficient (COR), the stochastic sign change (SSC), the standard deviation of ratios (SDR), the sum of the absolute differences (SAD) and a new function based on a local correlation coefficient (LOC) were tested in the registration of photic neuroactivation (ACT), epilepsy (EPL) and Wada (WAD) SPET studies. The comparison included simulated and real studies. The translation error in registration was 0.1 +/- 0.1 pixels (mean +/- S.D.) for all functions of merit for the complete set of simulated studies (10 runs for each ACT, EPL and WAD). For rotation, LOC yielded the best results with a mean error of 0.3 +/- 0.2 degree and a maximum error of 0.6 degree. Slightly higher errors were found with SAD (0.4 +/- 0.2 degree, maximum 1.0 degree) and COR (0.5 +/- 1.0 degree, maximum 1.0 degree). The highest errors were found with SDR (0.8 +/- 1.0 degree, maximum 4.8 degrees) and SSC (0.8 +/- 1.1 degrees, maximum 4.7 degrees). The results obtained from five real studies of ACT, of EPL and of WAD were in agreement with the findings from the simulated studies, thus confirming the robustness of LOC, SAD and COR for the registration of 99Tcm-HMPAO brain SPET studies.
99Tcm-HMPAO脑单光子发射计算机断层显像(SPET)研究的配准采用了五种效能函数。在光神经激活(ACT)、癫痫(EPL)和Wada(WAD)SPET研究的配准中,对相关系数(COR)、随机符号变化(SSC)、比值标准差(SDR)、绝对差值之和(SAD)以及基于局部相关系数的新函数(LOC)进行了测试。比较包括模拟研究和实际研究。对于整套模拟研究(ACT、EPL和WAD各10次运行),所有效能函数的配准平移误差为0.1±0.1像素(均值±标准差)。对于旋转,LOC产生的结果最佳,平均误差为0.3±0.2度,最大误差为0.6度。SAD(0.4±0.2度,最大1.0度)和COR(0.5±1.0度,最大1.0度)的误差略高。SDR(0.8±1.0度,最大4.8度)和SSC(0.8±1.1度,最大4.7度)的误差最高。从ACT、EPL和WAD的五项实际研究中获得的结果与模拟研究的结果一致,从而证实了LOC、SAD和COR在99Tcm-HMPAO脑SPET研究配准中的稳健性。