Soto J A, Múnera F, Cardoso N, Guarín O, Medina S
Department of Radiology, Universidad de Antioquia, Hospital Universitario San Vicente de Paul, Medellín, Colombia.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999 Mar-Apr;23(2):188-96. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199903000-00005.
The purpose of this work was to assess the performance of helical CT angiography (CTA) in the diagnosis of injuries to large arteries of the extremities.
We performed helical CTA on 45 consecutive patients referred for conventional angiography for evaluation of suspected arterial injuries after sustaining trauma to the extremities (13 upper, 32 lower). Two radiologists interpreted the helical CTA studies independently. Diagnostic performance parameters evaluated included sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and interobserver agreement (kappa statistics). Conventional angiography was used as the standard of reference for determination of final diagnoses.
Forty-three of 45 patients (96%) had diagnostic helical CTA examinations. Final diagnoses in these 43 patients were arterial occlusion (n = 7), partial obstruction (n = 3), pseudoaneurysm (n = 5), arteriovenous fistula (n = 1), pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula (n = 3), and normal findings (n = 24). Sensitivity and specificity were 90% [95% confidence interval (CI), 80-99] and 100% (95% CI, 99-100), respectively, for Reader 1 and 100% (95% CI, 99-100) and 100% (95% CI, 99-100), respectively, for Reader 2. ROC curve analysis revealed high diagnostic performance, with areas under the curve of >0.9 for both readers. Interobserver agreement was 0.9.
The diagnostic performance of helical CTA for detection of major injuries of large arteries of the extremities is high.
本研究旨在评估螺旋CT血管造影(CTA)在诊断四肢大动脉损伤中的性能。
我们对45例因怀疑四肢创伤后动脉损伤而接受传统血管造影检查的连续患者进行了螺旋CTA检查(上肢13例,下肢32例)。两名放射科医生独立解读螺旋CTA检查结果。评估的诊断性能参数包括敏感性、特异性、受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线和观察者间一致性(kappa统计量)。传统血管造影被用作确定最终诊断的参考标准。
45例患者中有43例(96%)的螺旋CTA检查具有诊断价值。这43例患者的最终诊断为动脉闭塞(n = 7)、部分阻塞(n = 3)、假性动脉瘤(n = 5)、动静脉瘘(n = 1)、假性动脉瘤和动静脉瘘(n = 3)以及正常结果(n = 24)。读者1的敏感性和特异性分别为90% [95%置信区间(CI),80 - 99]和100%(95% CI,99 - 100),读者2的敏感性和特异性分别为100%(95% CI,99 - 100)和100%(95% CI,99 - 100)。ROC曲线分析显示诊断性能较高,两位读者的曲线下面积均>0.9。观察者间一致性为0.9。
螺旋CTA检测四肢大动脉主要损伤的诊断性能较高。