Masini G, Dianda R, Gherardi C
G Ital Cardiol. 1976 Sep-Oct;6(5):870-81.
In nine patients with the tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome, a dysfunction of sinusal automatism was observed, shown by a prolonged recovery time of sinus node for six of the patients, and by an insufficient response to atropine in all nine. In two of the five patients, where a study of seno-atrial conduction was possible a conduction defect at this level was noticed. In three patients (33%), asystole was observed: in one patient in the course of a tachycardial crisis; during the passage of an atrial fibrillation in sinusal rhythm in another, and following premature isolated atrial pulsations in the third. The observations of asystole pause in the third patient following premature isolated beats which were longer than those induced electrically, led to the conclusion that, more than a sinusal automatism or sino-atrial conduction defect, asystole can be due to repetitive re-entries that are not reproduced at the level of the sino-atrial junction. The atrial response obtained in another patient with atrial stimulation slightly superior to the threshold, seems to exclude an atrial inexcitability hypothesis. The paroxysmal tachycardia and the atrial fibrillation were the most frequently noted arrhythmias; atrial flutter was only rarely observed. A rotation of rhythm disturbances was recorded in four of the nine patients, both on diverse occasions and during one crisis. The atrial electrostimulation performed on a patient during asystole pauses occurred spontaneously during the course of a tachy cardial crisis, allowed conduction of the atria only for 1-2 stimuli, and did not impede the recovery of the tachycardial paroxysm. It is probable that the conduction disturbances and/or the atrial excitability, which have the same determining cause of sinusal dysfunction, can be responsible for atrial arrhythmias, with the characteristic symptom of the tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome.
在9例心动过速-心动过缓综合征患者中,观察到窦房结自律功能障碍,6例患者表现为窦房结恢复时间延长,所有9例患者对阿托品反应不足。在5例可行窦房传导研究的患者中,有2例发现该水平存在传导缺陷。3例患者(33%)出现心脏停搏:1例在心动过速发作时;另1例在房颤转为窦性心律过程中;第3例在孤立性房性早搏之后。第3例患者在孤立性早搏后出现的心脏停搏间歇长于电刺激诱发的间歇,由此得出结论,心脏停搏可能更多是由于在窦房结连接处未重现的反复折返,而非窦房结自律性或窦房传导缺陷。另一例患者在心房刺激略高于阈值时获得的心房反应,似乎排除了心房兴奋性缺失的假说。阵发性心动过速和房颤是最常见的心律失常;心房扑动仅很少见。9例患者中有4例记录到心律失常的交替出现,包括在不同场合以及一次发作过程中。在1例患者心动过速发作时自发出现心脏停搏间歇期间进行心房电刺激,心房仅能传导1 - 2次刺激,且未阻止心动过速发作的恢复。传导障碍和/或心房兴奋性异常可能由相同的窦房结功能障碍病因引起,它们可能是导致心房心律失常的原因,而心动过速-心动过缓综合征具有其特征性症状。