Hampers L C, Cha S, Gutglass D J, Krug S E, Binns H J
Children's Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
Pediatrics. 1999 Apr;103(4 Pt 2):877-82.
We sought to determine whether information on hospital charges (prices) would affect test-ordering and quality of patient care in a pediatric emergency department (ED).
Prospective, nonblind, controlled trial of price information.
Urban, university-affiliated pediatric ED.
We prospectively assessed patients 2 months to 10 years of age with a presenting temperature >/=38.5 degrees C or complaint of vomiting, diarrhea, or decreased oral intake. The assessments were done during three periods: September 1997 through December 1997 (control), January 1998 through March 1998 (intervention), and April 1998 (washout). In the control and washout periods, physicians noted tests ordered on a list attached to each chart. In the intervention period, physicians noted tests ordered on a similar list that included standard hospital charges for each test. Records of each visit were reviewed to determine clinical and demographic information as well as patient disposition. In the control and intervention periods, families of nonadmitted patients were interviewed by telephone 7 days after the visit.
When controlled for triage level, vital signs, and admission rates, in a multivariate model, charges for tests in the intervention period were 27% less than charges in the control period. The greatest decrease was seen among low-acuity, nonadmitted patients (43%). In telephone follow-up, patients in the intervention period were slightly more likely to have made an unscheduled follow-up visit to a health care provider (24.4% vs 17.8%), but did not differ on improved condition (86.7% vs 83.4%) or family satisfaction (93.8% vs 93.0%). Adjusted charges in the washout period were 15% lower than in the control period and 15% higher than in the intervention period.
Providing price information was associated with a significant reduction in charges for tests ordered on pediatric ED patients with acute illness not requiring admission. This decrease was associated with a slightly higher rate of unscheduled follow-up, but no difference in subjective outcomes or family satisfaction.
我们试图确定有关医院收费(价格)的信息是否会影响儿科急诊科(ED)的检查医嘱及患者护理质量。
价格信息的前瞻性、非盲法对照试验。
城市中与大学相关的儿科急诊科。
我们前瞻性地评估了年龄在2个月至10岁之间、体温≥38.5摄氏度或有呕吐、腹泻或经口摄入量减少主诉的患者。评估在三个时间段进行:1997年9月至1997年12月(对照期)、1998年1月至1998年3月(干预期)和1998年4月(洗脱期)。在对照期和洗脱期,医生在附于每张病历的清单上记录所开的检查项目。在干预期,医生在类似的清单上记录所开的检查项目,该清单包括每项检查的标准医院收费。对每次就诊记录进行审查,以确定临床和人口统计学信息以及患者处置情况。在对照期和干预期,对未住院患者的家属在就诊7天后进行电话访谈。
在多变量模型中,在对分诊级别、生命体征和住院率进行控制后,干预期的检查费用比对照期低27%。在低急症、未住院患者中降幅最大(43%)。在电话随访中,干预期的患者进行计划外复诊的可能性略高(24.4%对17.