• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

监管强度与医院成本增长。

Regulatory intensity and hospital cost growth.

作者信息

Thorpe K E, Phelps C E

机构信息

Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 1990 Sep;9(2):143-66. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(90)90015-u.

DOI:10.1016/0167-6296(90)90015-u
PMID:10107499
Abstract

This article parameterizes and examines the regulatory intensity of New York's all-payer rate setting system. The model, using hospital level data, compares the effects of specific features of rate-setting designed to promote cost containment. Two indicators measuring regulatory intensity were examined; the extent of hospital-specific disallowances, and how frequently the base year was adjusted (the degree of prospectivity). The results indicate that both the degree of prospectivity and the extent of disallowances importantly affect cost growth. Hospitals, when constrained, primarily achieved cost savings through reductions in non-medical personnel.

摘要

本文对纽约全支付方费率设定系统的监管强度进行了参数化并加以考察。该模型利用医院层面的数据,比较了旨在促进成本控制的费率设定特定特征的影响。考察了两个衡量监管强度的指标;特定医院不允许列支的程度,以及基年调整的频率(前瞻性程度)。结果表明,前瞻性程度和不允许列支的程度都对成本增长有重要影响。医院在受到约束时,主要通过减少非医疗人员来实现成本节约。

相似文献

1
Regulatory intensity and hospital cost growth.监管强度与医院成本增长。
J Health Econ. 1990 Sep;9(2):143-66. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(90)90015-u.
2
Prospective reimbursement in New York.纽约的预期报销。
Top Health Care Financ. 1979 Fall;6(1):97-108.
3
Rate regulation as a policy tool: lessons from New York State.作为政策工具的费率监管:来自纽约州的经验教训。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1995 Spring;16(3):151-75.
4
Rate setting and hospital cost-containment: all-payer versus partial-payer approaches.费率设定与医院成本控制:全付费方与部分付费方方法
Health Serv Res. 1987 Aug;22(3):307-26.
5
Prospective reimbursement in New Jersey.新泽西州的预期报销。
Top Health Care Financ. 1979 Fall;6(1):87-96.
6
Hospital rate-setting programs: how, and how well, do they work?医院费率设定计划:它们如何运作,效果如何?
Top Health Care Financ. 1979 Fall;6(1):15-23.
7
Prospective reimbursement in Washington State.华盛顿州的前瞻性报销。
Top Health Care Financ. 1979 Fall;6(1):117-26.
8
The regulation strategy for controlling hospital costs.控制医院成本的调控策略。
N Engl J Med. 1981 Nov 19;305(21):1249-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198111193052104.
9
Regulatory regimes and state cost containment programs.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1993 Summer;18(2):491-502. doi: 10.1215/03616878-18-2-491.
10
Comprehensive reform of health care regulation: cost control and universal access.医疗保健监管的全面改革:成本控制与全民医保
J Health Hum Resour Adm. 1986 Winter;8(3):231-48.

引用本文的文献

1
Operationalizing game-theoretic weighting in public hospital cost control: an implementation framework from Chinese tertiary hospitals.公立医院成本控制中博弈论加权法的实施:来自中国三级医院的实施框架
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2025 Mar 31;23(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12962-025-00616-w.
2
All-payer ratesetting: Down but not out.全支付方费率设定:虽受挫折但未出局。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1992 Mar;1991(Suppl):35-41.
3
Nonprice competition and quality of care in managed care: the New York SCHIP market.管理式医疗中的非价格竞争与医疗质量:纽约儿童健康保险计划市场
Health Serv Res. 2008 Jun;43(3):971-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00805.x.
4
Rate regulation as a policy tool: lessons from New York State.作为政策工具的费率监管:来自纽约州的经验教训。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1995 Spring;16(3):151-75.
5
Effects of selected cost-containment efforts: 1971-1993.1971 - 1993年部分成本控制措施的效果
Health Care Financ Rev. 1993 Spring;14(3):183-225.