• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康政治与政策的经济学视角

An economic perspective on health politics and policy.

作者信息

Feldstein P J

机构信息

University of California, Irvine.

出版信息

Q Rev Econ Bus. 1990 Winter;30(4):117-35.

PMID:10109702
Abstract

This article uses a self-interest model to explain health care legislation. Seemingly uncoordinated, contradictory, inefficient, and inequitable legislative outcome are shown to be the result of a rational process in which the participants, including legislators, act according to their calculation of costs and benefits. Those groups able to offer political support receive net benefits at the expense of those who are less politically powerful. This framework is used to examine different types of health legislation with the emphasis on explicit redistributive policies such as Medicare and Medicaid.

摘要

本文运用自利模型来解释医疗保健立法。看似不协调、相互矛盾、低效且不公平的立法结果,实则是一个理性过程的产物,在此过程中,包括立法者在内的参与者依据自身对成本和收益的计算来行事。那些能够提供政治支持的群体以政治影响力较弱的群体为代价获得了净收益。这一框架被用于审视不同类型的医疗立法,重点关注诸如医疗保险和医疗补助等明确的再分配政策。

相似文献

1
An economic perspective on health politics and policy.健康政治与政策的经济学视角
Q Rev Econ Bus. 1990 Winter;30(4):117-35.
2
Washington: will Congress stop playing politics with health care?
Med Econ. 1999 Jan 11;76(1):83-4, 87-8, 91 passim.
3
U.S. Senator Spencer Abraham (R-MI). A healthcare legislative update: the Health Care Provider Bill of Rights (S. 2999).
Hosp Outlook. 2000 Sep;3(7):6, 12.
4
Rising to the top. Industry groups quiet about Ryan's effect on policies.升至顶端。行业组织对瑞安对政策的影响保持沉默。
Mod Healthc. 2012 Aug 20;42(34):8-9.
5
Understanding the flow of health policy in the United States: self-interest or ignorance?理解美国卫生政策的走向:是出于自身利益还是无知?
Q Rev Econ Bus. 1990 Winter;30(4):140-7.
6
Health care is casualty in current budget battle.医疗保健在当前的预算争斗中成为牺牲品。
Healthc Financ Manage. 2002 Mar;56(3):28, 30.
7
Politics of the federal budget process.联邦预算程序的政治因素。
J Allied Health. 2008 Spring;37(1):3-7.
8
Budget backlash. Disparate forces in healthcare unite to decry Bush's healthcare budget for 2008; 'a remarkable leap backward to the stone age'.预算遭强烈反对。医疗保健领域的不同力量联合起来谴责布什2008年的医疗保健预算;“向石器时代的一次显著倒退”。
Mod Healthc. 2007 Feb 12;37(7):6-7, 16, 1.
9
The conditions for state action in Florida's health-care market.
J Health Soc Behav. 1999 Jun;40(2):159-74.
10
Corporate political strategy: incorporating the management of public policy issues into hospital strategy.企业政治战略:将公共政策问题的管理纳入医院战略。
Health Care Manage Rev. 1997 Summer;22(3):53-63.