• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Medical treatment effectiveness research. A view from inside the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.

作者信息

Raskin I E, Maklan C W

机构信息

Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.

出版信息

Eval Health Prof. 1991 Jun;14(2):161-86. doi: 10.1177/016327879101400203.

DOI:10.1177/016327879101400203
PMID:10111355
Abstract

The Medical Treatment Effectiveness Program (MEDTEP) is an intradepartmental federal program of the Department of Health and Human Services, for which the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) has lead responsibility. This article presents a staff perspective on the conceptual framework for the MEDTEP research agenda and on the opportunity to address empirically the relationships between particular health care services and patient outcomes. It reviews programmatic priorities and identifies active MEDTEP research projects, with descriptions of 11 patient outcomes research team projects. Finally, it addresses the need to produce useful research findings in the short term and the implications of a dual concern for the quality and cost of health care.

摘要

相似文献

1
Medical treatment effectiveness research. A view from inside the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.
Eval Health Prof. 1991 Jun;14(2):161-86. doi: 10.1177/016327879101400203.
2
Planning and accountability at AHCPR: applying the quality message at home. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.美国医疗保健政策与研究机构(AHCPR)的规划与问责制:将质量理念应用于自身。美国医疗保健政策与研究机构
Health Serv Res. 1999 Jun;34(2):461-83.
3
The role of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) in improving outcomes of care.医疗保健政策与研究机构(AHCPR)在改善医疗结果方面的作用。
Nurs Clin North Am. 1997 Sep;32(3):521-42.
4
Outcomes of adoption: measuring evidence uptake by individuals and organizations.采用的结果:衡量个人和组织对证据的采纳情况。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1 Suppl 1:S41-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2004.04048.x.
5
Agency for Health Care Policy and Research: improving health care through guidelines and outcomes research.医疗保健政策与研究机构:通过指南和结果研究改善医疗保健。
Hosp Formul. 1993 Nov;28(11):933-4, 939-42.
6
Financing medical effectiveness research: role of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.为医疗效果研究提供资金:医疗保健政策与研究局的作用。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Dec 31;703:295-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26365.x.
7
A plan to strengthen public health in the United States.一项加强美国公共卫生的计划。
Public Health Rep. 1991;106 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1-85.
8
Appropriate effectiveness: a tale of carts and horses.恰当的有效性:本末倒置的故事。
QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992 Oct;18(10):322-6. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30555-3.
9
Guest Editorial: Intersections for mutual success in nursing and health services research.
Nurs Outlook. 2005 Nov-Dec;53(6):263-5. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2005.06.006.
10
Carolyn M. Clancy, MD, Director, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
J Investig Med. 2004 Mar;52(2):77-80. doi: 10.1136/jim-52-02-01.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of the effectiveness of supply-side cost-containment measures.供应方成本控制措施有效性评估。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1992 Mar;1991(Suppl):13-20.
2
Circular instead of hierarchical: methodological principles for the evaluation of complex interventions.循环而非层级:复杂干预评估的方法学原则
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jun 24;6:29. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-29.
3
A performance indicator of psychosocial services in enhanced prenatal care of Medicaid-eligible women.
Matern Child Health J. 1998 Sep;2(3):131-43. doi: 10.1023/a:1021823009297.
4
Health status, outcome, and attributability: is a red rose red in the dark?健康状况、结果及可归因性:红玫瑰在黑暗中还是红色的吗?
Qual Health Care. 1993 Dec;2(4):259-62. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.4.259.
5
Health outcomes research on Hispanics/Latinos.关于西班牙裔/拉丁裔的健康结果研究。
J Med Syst. 1996 Oct;20(5):235-54. doi: 10.1007/BF02257038.
6
Basic concepts and fundamental issues in technology assessment.技术评估中的基本概念与根本问题。
Intensive Care Med. 1993;19(2):117-21. doi: 10.1007/BF01708374.