Suppr超能文献

内华达州近期的一项裁决扩大了企业过失原则。

Corporate negligence doctrine expanded in recent Nevada ruling.

作者信息

Davis C D

机构信息

Texas Hospital Association.

出版信息

Healthtexas. 1990 Jan;45(8):8-9.

Abstract

In summary, Texas courts generally do not hold hospitals liable for negligent acts of non-employee physicians under the theory of corporate liability. Hospitals should take care to maintain fair and efficient procedures for granting and reviewing physician staff privileges. Hospitals clearly have a duty to maintain competent staff members and should withhold staff privileges if a physician is incompetent. Unfortunately, some plaintiffs' attorneys attempt to equate incompetence with a particular, and often singular, act. No Texas court has upheld this claim, and none should. A bad result, a negligent act or a medical accident does not, by itself, constitute incompetence.

摘要

总之,根据企业责任理论,得克萨斯州的法院通常不会判定医院对非雇员医生的过失行为负责。医院应注意维持授予和审查医生员工特权的公平且高效的程序。医院显然有责任维持有能力的员工队伍,如果医生不胜任,就应取消其员工特权。不幸的是,一些原告律师试图将不胜任等同于某一特定且往往是单一的行为。得克萨斯州没有任何一家法院支持这种说法,也不应该有。一个糟糕的结果、一个过失行为或一起医疗事故本身并不构成不胜任。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验