The Independent Health Facilities Act represents an attempt by the Ontario Government to control the unplanned proliferation of health clinics in the community offering specialized services often seen as competing with public hospitals, and to provide mechanisms to ensure that standards and quality care are maintained in these clinics. Although the Act was originally aimed at about 25 ambulatory surgi-centers performing such procedures as cataract surgery and abortions, amendments have broadened the Act's scope to include most clinics offering such diagnostic services as x-ray and ultra sound. The legislation was opposed by some medical specialties and proved very controversial. Other provinces have looked to this legislation as a means of controlling health care costs by reducing reliance on hospitals for certain kinds of procedures and by moving from fee for service to various alternative funding mechanisms for those procedures provided by out-of-community clinics as approved and licensed in a place and manner decided upon by government. The papers in this issue of the journal reflect a conference sponsored by the Canadian Institute of Law and Medicine to examine this legislation one year after it came into force. The comments of government, physicians, lawyers and others most directly affected by this new statute are set out in a selected number of presentations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
《独立卫生设施法案》是安大略省政府的一项举措,旨在控制社区中提供专业服务的卫生诊所的无序扩张,这些服务通常被视为与公立医院形成竞争,并提供机制以确保这些诊所维持标准和优质护理。尽管该法案最初针对约25家进行白内障手术和堕胎等手术的门诊手术中心,但修正案扩大了该法案的范围,将提供X光和超声波等诊断服务的大多数诊所纳入其中。该立法遭到了一些医学专科的反对,并引发了很大争议。其他省份将这项立法视为一种控制医疗成本的手段,方法是减少对医院进行某些手术的依赖,并从按服务收费转向为社区外诊所提供的那些经政府批准和许可的手术采用各种替代资金机制。本期杂志中的论文反映了加拿大法律与医学研究所主办的一次会议,该会议在这项立法生效一年后对其进行审查。政府、医生、律师以及受这项新法规影响最直接的其他人的意见在若干选定的报告中列出。(摘要截选于250词)