• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1991年宾夕法尼亚州参议院竞选与国民健康保险

The 1991 Pennsylvania Senate race and national health insurance.

作者信息

Blendon R J, Szalay U S, Altman D E, Chervinsky G

机构信息

Harvard School of Public Health.

出版信息

J Am Health Policy. 1992 Jan-Feb;2(1):21-4.

PMID:10116478
Abstract

Voter interest in reform of the American health care system played a central role in the November 5 come-from-behind reelection victory of Democratic Senator Harris Wofford of Pennsylvania over Republican candidate Richard Thornburgh. In a post-election poll of 1,000 Pennsylvania voters, over 50 percent identified "national health insurance" as one of two issues that mattered most in deciding how to vote. And 21 percent of voters said the issue was the "single most important factor" in their voting decision. The results of the Pennsylvania Senate race suggest that universal health care has arrived as a mainstream political issue and that political candidates who fail to address the issue do so at their peril.

摘要

选民对美国医疗保健系统改革的关注,在宾夕法尼亚州民主党参议员哈里斯·沃福德于11月5日后来居上击败共和党候选人理查德·索恩伯勒的再次选举胜利中起到了核心作用。在对1000名宾夕法尼亚州选民进行的选后民意调查中,超过50%的人将“国家医疗保险”列为决定如何投票时最重要的两个问题之一。21%的选民表示,这个问题是他们投票决定中的“唯一最重要因素”。宾夕法尼亚州参议院竞选的结果表明,全民医疗保健已成为一个主流政治问题,而未能解决这个问题的政治候选人将自担风险。

相似文献

1
The 1991 Pennsylvania Senate race and national health insurance.1991年宾夕法尼亚州参议院竞选与国民健康保险
J Am Health Policy. 1992 Jan-Feb;2(1):21-4.
2
A second look at the Pennsylvania special election.
J Am Health Policy. 1992 Jan-Feb;2(1):25-9.
3
Wofford-Thornburgh: a turning point for health reform.
J Am Health Policy. 1992 Jan-Feb;2(1):17-20.
4
The revolution that wasn't: health care's role in the 1992 elections.
J Am Health Policy. 1993 Jan-Feb;3(1):25-8.
5
Pennsylvania voters prove healthcare is an important issue.
Health Prog. 1992 Jan-Feb;73(1):10-2, 16.
6
Voters and health care in the 2004 election.2004年选举中的选民与医疗保健
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Jun;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-86-W5-96. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.86.
7
Health care in the 2004 presidential election.2004年总统选举中的医疗保健问题。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 23;351(13):1314-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa042360.
8
Health care, the California primary, and the 1992 election.
J Am Health Policy. 1992 Jul-Aug;2(4):14-9.
9
The Nixon years: failed national health reform from both parties.尼克松时代:两党在全国医疗改革上均告失败。
Physician Exec. 1992 May-Jun;18(3):20-6.
10
New Hampshire, health care, and the 1992 election.
J Am Health Policy. 1992 May-Jun;2(3):16-22.