Poirier T I, Giudici R A
Duquesne University.
Hosp Pharm. 1992 May;27(5):408, 411-5.
Five patient counseling drug information programs are evaluated using specific criteria definitions. This article compares the features and ratings of each program. The scope of drug coverage is found to be good to excellent. Most of the programs fared poorly in the timeliness of the database. Updates to the programs range from quarterly to undefined schedule. The ease of readability of all the programs is excellent. The inclusion of key components of information is determined to be good to excellent. The overall patient performance ratings are excellent for each of the programs. The programs are all competitively priced. All of the programs evaluated are easy to use. The only distinguishing feature among the programs is the format of the printed output.
使用特定的标准定义对五个患者咨询药物信息程序进行了评估。本文比较了每个程序的特点和评级。发现药物覆盖范围良好至优秀。大多数程序在数据库的及时性方面表现不佳。程序更新从每季度一次到未定义的时间表不等。所有程序的易读性都非常好。信息关键组件的包含情况被判定为良好至优秀。每个程序的总体患者表现评级都非常好。这些程序定价都具有竞争力。所有评估的程序都易于使用。这些程序之间唯一的区别特征是打印输出的格式。
