Bole T J
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City 73190.
HEC Forum. 1992;4(2):121-33. doi: 10.1007/BF00058014.
James Drane's policy proposals for Roman Catholic hospitals, which would allow induction of a firmly diagnosed anencephalic fetus upon the mother's considered request, are defended. Drane's defense of his proposals, by focussing upon the empirical facts of anencephaly and attempting to abstract from the question of whether or not the anencephalic is a potential person, is held to be untenable. However, examination of the Roman Catholic proscription against abortion shows that it applies to humans who are, or might be, persons or potential persons. And the facts of anencephaly show that the anencephalic does not have the biological substrate to be a potential person. Hence the proscription does not apply to induction of the anencephalic fetus.
詹姆斯·德雷恩针对罗马天主教医院提出的政策建议得到了辩护,该建议允许在母亲经过深思熟虑提出请求后,引产已确诊为无脑儿的胎儿。德雷恩对其建议的辩护,聚焦于无脑儿的实证事实,并试图撇开无脑儿是否为潜在人的问题,这种辩护被认为是站不住脚的。然而,对罗马天主教堕胎禁令的审视表明,它适用于那些是或可能是实际的人或潜在人的人类。而无脑儿的事实表明,无脑儿没有成为潜在人的生物学基础。因此,该禁令不适用于引产无脑儿胎儿。