• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

(根据罗马天主教教义)引产未存活的无脑儿胎儿的合法性:对德雷恩教授政策提议的思考

The licitness (according to Roman Catholic premises) of inducing the non-viable anencephalic fetus: reflections on Professor Drane's policy proposals.

作者信息

Bole T J

机构信息

University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City 73190.

出版信息

HEC Forum. 1992;4(2):121-33. doi: 10.1007/BF00058014.

DOI:10.1007/BF00058014
PMID:10119669
Abstract

James Drane's policy proposals for Roman Catholic hospitals, which would allow induction of a firmly diagnosed anencephalic fetus upon the mother's considered request, are defended. Drane's defense of his proposals, by focussing upon the empirical facts of anencephaly and attempting to abstract from the question of whether or not the anencephalic is a potential person, is held to be untenable. However, examination of the Roman Catholic proscription against abortion shows that it applies to humans who are, or might be, persons or potential persons. And the facts of anencephaly show that the anencephalic does not have the biological substrate to be a potential person. Hence the proscription does not apply to induction of the anencephalic fetus.

摘要

詹姆斯·德雷恩针对罗马天主教医院提出的政策建议得到了辩护,该建议允许在母亲经过深思熟虑提出请求后,引产已确诊为无脑儿的胎儿。德雷恩对其建议的辩护,聚焦于无脑儿的实证事实,并试图撇开无脑儿是否为潜在人的问题,这种辩护被认为是站不住脚的。然而,对罗马天主教堕胎禁令的审视表明,它适用于那些是或可能是实际的人或潜在人的人类。而无脑儿的事实表明,无脑儿没有成为潜在人的生物学基础。因此,该禁令不适用于引产无脑儿胎儿。

相似文献

1
The licitness (according to Roman Catholic premises) of inducing the non-viable anencephalic fetus: reflections on Professor Drane's policy proposals.(根据罗马天主教教义)引产未存活的无脑儿胎儿的合法性:对德雷恩教授政策提议的思考
HEC Forum. 1992;4(2):121-33. doi: 10.1007/BF00058014.
2
Anencephaly and the interruption of pregnancy: policy proposals for HECs.无脑儿与妊娠中断:高等教育委员会的政策建议
HEC Forum. 1992;4(2):103-19. doi: 10.1007/BF00058013.
3
The morality of induced delivery of the anencephalic fetus prior to viability.未存活的无脑儿引产的道德问题。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1993 Dec;3(4):357-69. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0087.
4
Induced delivery of anencephalic fetuses: a response to James L. Walsh and Moira M. McQueen.无脑儿的引产:对詹姆斯·L·沃尔什和莫伊拉·M·麦奎因的回应
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1994 Mar;4(1):47-53. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0093.
5
Ethics consultation: induction of labor for a woman with an anencephalic fetus.伦理咨询:为一名怀有无脑儿胎儿的女性引产。
Linacre Q. 1991 Aug;58(3):44-9. doi: 10.1080/00243639.1991.11878118.
6
Ethical opinions in regard to the question of early delivery of anencephalic infants.关于无脑儿早产问题的伦理观点。
Linacre Q. 1996 Aug;63(3):55-9. doi: 10.1080/20508549.1999.11878357.
7
The Catholic position on abortion.天主教关于堕胎的立场。
Linacre Q. 1993 Nov;60(4):67-75. doi: 10.1080/20508549.1993.11878230.
8
Religion and abortion: Roman Catholicism lost in the pelvic zone.宗教与堕胎:罗马天主教在盆腔地带迷失了方向。
Womens Health Issues. 1993 Fall;3(3):132-7. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80246-4.
9
A Revised Moral Appraisal of Early Induction of Labor in Cases of Anencephaly.无脑畸形病例中早期引产的修正道德评价。
HEC Forum. 2023 Dec;35(4):389-406. doi: 10.1007/s10730-022-09475-x. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
10
Moral principles concerning infants with anencephaly.关于无脑儿的道德原则。
Origins. 1996 Oct 10;26(17):276.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethics consultation: induction of labor for a woman with an anencephalic fetus.伦理咨询:为一名怀有无脑儿胎儿的女性引产。
Linacre Q. 1991 Aug;58(3):44-9. doi: 10.1080/00243639.1991.11878118.
2
How should Catholic hospitals treat an anencephalic fetus?天主教医院应如何对待无脑儿胎儿?
Hosp Prog. 1983 Nov;64(11):50-1.
3
The infant with anencephaly.
N Engl J Med. 1990 Mar 8;322(10):669-74. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199003083221006.
4
Who is entitled to double effect?谁有权享有双重效果?
J Med Philos. 1991 Oct;16(5):475-94; discussion 511-4. doi: 10.1093/jmp/16.5.475.