• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

残疾老年人的长期护理安排:私人与公共部门的作用

Long term care arrangements for elderly persons with disabilities: private and public roles.

作者信息

Spillman B C, Kemper P

机构信息

Center for Intramural Research, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, MD 20852.

出版信息

Home Health Care Serv Q. 1992;13(1-2):5-34.

PMID:10126433
Abstract

When private resources are defined broadly to include informal care as well as private expenditures, 73 percent of the elderly long term care population rely entirely on private resources for their care. The emphasis of current programs on institutional care directs public resources toward those with more serious disability and less family to care for them. Among those with four or five disabilities in ADLS, 35 percent of those without a spouse or children currently receive no public support, compared with nearly 80 percent of those with both a spouse and children. Thus, even if restricted to seriously disabled persons, a new program expanding public long term care financing would increase eligibility for public benefits disproportionately among those with greater informal care resources.

摘要

当私人资源被宽泛定义为包括非正式照料以及私人支出时,73%的老年长期护理人群完全依靠私人资源来获得照料。当前项目对机构照料的重视将公共资源导向了那些残疾程度更严重且照料他们的家人较少的人群。在日常生活活动能力有四项或五项残疾的人群中,目前没有配偶或子女的人中有35%未得到任何公共支持,相比之下,有配偶和子女的人这一比例接近80%。因此,即便仅限于严重残疾者,一项扩大公共长期护理资金的新项目也会使那些拥有更多非正式照料资源的人群获得公共福利资格的比例出现不成比例的增加。

相似文献

1
Long term care arrangements for elderly persons with disabilities: private and public roles.残疾老年人的长期护理安排:私人与公共部门的作用
Home Health Care Serv Q. 1992;13(1-2):5-34.
2
Home care in New York City: providers, payers, and clients.纽约市的居家护理:提供者、支付方与客户。
Pap Ser United Hosp Fund N Y. 1987 Feb(6):1-46.
3
Long-term care, Medicaid, and impoverishment of the elderly.长期护理、医疗补助与老年人贫困
Milbank Q. 1993;71(4):575-99.
4
Costs of community care for disabled elderly persons: the policy implications.残疾老年人社区护理成本:政策影响
Inquiry. 1990 Spring;27(1):61-72.
5
Is family care on the decline? A longitudinal investigation of the substitution of formal long-term care services for informal care.家庭照料是否在减少?对正规长期护理服务替代非正规照料的纵向调查。
Milbank Q. 1993;71(4):601-24.
6
A comparative analysis of Medicaid long-term care policies and their effects on elderly dual enrollees.医疗补助长期护理政策及其对老年双重参保者影响的比较分析
Health Econ. 2009 Mar;18(3):275-90. doi: 10.1002/hec.1367.
7
The impact of private long-term care insurance on claimants: formal and informal care in the community.私人长期护理保险对索赔者的影响:社区中的正式和非正式护理
Policy Brief (Cent Home Care Policy Res). 2002 Spring(11):1-4.
8
Family care of the elderly: the role of public policy.老年人的家庭照料:公共政策的作用。
Milbank Q. 1986;64(1):34-75.
9
Cost containment policies in long-term care.长期护理中的成本控制政策。
Inquiry. 1985 Spring;22(1):7-23.
10
The use of formal and informal home care by the disabled elderly.残疾老年人对正式和非正式居家护理的使用情况。
Health Serv Res. 1992 Oct;27(4):421-51.