Suppr超能文献

社会服务合同的双刃剑:公共问责与非营利组织自主性

The double-edged sword of social service contracting: public accountability versus nonprofit autonomy.

作者信息

Ferris J M

机构信息

School of Public Administration, University of Southern California.

出版信息

Nonprofit Manag Leadersh. 1993 Summer;3(4):363-76. doi: 10.1002/nml.4130030404.

Abstract

The increased role of government contracts in the funding of nonprofits has heightened tensions as governments seek accountability and nonprofits seek to preserve autonomy. Considering both sides of the contract market this article suggests that the threat of government funding is exaggerated. Nonprofits are attractive contractor options because of their experience and trustworthiness. Governments should recognize that excessive intrusions limit the advantages of the nonprofit sector. At the same time, nonprofits should be conscious of the implications of public funding, just as they must be of other sources of funding.

摘要

政府合同在非营利组织资金筹集方面作用的增强加剧了紧张关系,因为政府寻求问责,而非营利组织则力图保持自治。考虑到合同市场的双方,本文认为政府资金的威胁被夸大了。非营利组织因其经验和信誉而成为颇具吸引力的承包商选择。政府应认识到过度干预会限制非营利部门的优势。与此同时,非营利组织应意识到公共资金的影响,就如同它们必须意识到其他资金来源的影响一样。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验