Fleming G A
Athens Regional Medical Center, GA.
Physician Exec. 1993 May-Jun;19(3):37-41.
The reporting of quality of health care to the governing board has long been an enigma. Now we are in the midst of a revolution in health care, as we shift our focus from solely the clinical performance of individuals to a broader scope of assessing and improving all activities around patient services and patient care--i.e., management outcomes integrated with clinical outcomes to help identify opportunities to improve patient care. In addition, apprised of corporate liability for the quality of care provided in health care organizations, governing boards are raising questions and demanding more information. To maintain this high degree of interest in quality of health care, information should be restricted to what the board needs to know. This article will be confined to the hospital's organizationwide quality system of monitoring and evaluating. While medical staff credentialing and privileging are also board responsibilities and quality management activities should be used in the privileging and credentialing process, they will not be addressed in this article.
长期以来,向管理委员会汇报医疗保健质量一直是个谜。如今,我们正处于医疗保健领域的一场变革之中,我们将关注点从仅仅关注个人的临床表现,转向更广泛地评估和改进围绕患者服务和患者护理的所有活动,即把管理结果与临床结果相结合,以帮助确定改善患者护理的机会。此外,鉴于医疗保健机构所提供护理质量的企业责任,管理委员会提出了问题并要求提供更多信息。为保持对医疗保健质量的高度关注,信息应仅限于委员会需要了解的内容。本文将局限于医院的全组织质量监测和评估体系。虽然医务人员的资格认证和特权授予也是管理委员会的职责,且质量管理活动应在特权授予和资格认证过程中加以运用,但本文不会涉及这些内容。