• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健经济学正在发生变化——法律肯定会随之改变。

Health care economics is changing--the law is sure to follow.

作者信息

Lutes M E

机构信息

Epstein, Becker and Green, Washington, DC.

出版信息

Physician Exec. 1993 Nov-Dec;19(6):30-5.

PMID:10130282
Abstract

Law is intimately related to economics. As the economic relationships in a market change, the legal landscape evolves accordingly. Even if no health care reform is enacted at the federal level, ever-increasing portions of today's managed indemnity sector will convert to plans constraining enrollee choice and seeking to deliver cost-effective care through risk-sharing relationships (both corporate and contractual) with providers. This is inevitable, given employer and federal government pricing demands, and it is changing the face of health care law. If federal reform is enacted and/or the systems adopted in Minnesota, Maryland, Washington, and Florida (to name a few) are replicated elsewhere, the legal concerns of physicians and other providers will shift even more dramatically. In this article, some of the legal fall-out from these economic developments is discussed.

摘要

法律与经济密切相关。随着市场中经济关系的变化,法律格局也相应演变。即使联邦层面未颁布医疗保健改革法案,当今管理式赔偿部门中越来越大的部分也将转变为限制参保人选择,并试图通过与医疗服务提供者建立(公司和合同)风险分担关系来提供具有成本效益的医疗服务的计划。鉴于雇主和联邦政府的定价要求,这是不可避免的,而且它正在改变医疗保健法律的面貌。如果联邦改革得以颁布和/或明尼苏达州、马里兰州、华盛顿州和佛罗里达州(仅举几例)所采用的体系在其他地方得到复制,医生和其他医疗服务提供者的法律担忧将发生更为巨大的转变。本文将探讨这些经济发展带来的一些法律影响。

相似文献

1
Health care economics is changing--the law is sure to follow.医疗保健经济学正在发生变化——法律肯定会随之改变。
Physician Exec. 1993 Nov-Dec;19(6):30-5.
2
The legal framework for effective competition.有效竞争的法律框架。
Baxter Health Policy Rev. 1996;2:235-65.
3
Consumer issues and threats to health care market reform.消费者问题与医疗保健市场改革面临的威胁。
Manag Care Q. 1996 Autumn;4(4):49-57.
4
Managed competition, integrated delivery systems and antitrust.管理式竞争、整合式医疗服务体系与反垄断
Cornell Law Rev. 1994 Sep;79(6):1507-45.
5
Legal issues in accepting capitation.
Physician Exec. 1995 Jul;21(7):15-20.
6
Antitrust exemption: are health providers crying wolf?反垄断豁免:医疗服务提供者是在虚张声势吗?
J Am Health Policy. 1993 May-Jun;3(3):38-41.
7
Health insurance purchasing alliances: monopsony threat or procompetitive Rx for health sector ills?
Cornell Law Rev. 1994 Sep;79(6):1546-72.
8
Managed competition, antitrust, and the Clinton health reform plan: too modest a proposal.
Healthspan. 1993 Nov;10(10):21-4.
9
The MinnesotaCare Act of 1994.1994年的《明尼苏达医疗保健法案》。
Minn Med. 1994 Jul;77(7):17-22.
10
Wielding the wand without facing the music: allowing utilization review physicians to trump doctors' orders, but protecting them from legal risk ordinarily attached to the medical degree.挥舞着魔杖却不承担责任:允许利用审查医生推翻医生的医嘱,但保护他们免受通常与医学学位相关的法律风险。
Duke Law J. 2010 Feb;59(5):955-1000.