预先医疗指示：维护消费者选择权。
Advance patient directives: preserving consumer choice.
作者信息
Renick O, Hanson S, Nelson M
机构信息
Department of Health Administration, Southwest Texas State University, San Marcos 78668.
出版信息
Med Interface. 1994 Apr;7(4):84-7 contd.
PMID:10133362
Abstract
In the first of three articles, the authors discuss the public policy issues addressed by advance patient directives, including the Cruzan case and decision-making standards for incompetent patients.
摘要
在三篇系列文章的第一篇中，作者们讨论了患者预先指令所涉及的公共政策问题，包括克鲁赞案以及针对无行为能力患者的决策标准。
相似文献
1
Advance patient directives: preserving consumer choice.预先医疗指示：维护消费者选择权。
Med Interface. 1994 Apr;7(4):84-7 contd.
2
Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.无行为能力者与死亡权：寻求一致且有意义的标准。
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law. 1996 Jun(208):9-75.
3
Competency for creation, use, and revocation of psychiatric advance directives.创建、使用和撤销精神科预先指示的能力。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006;34(4):501-10.
4
Life and death after Cruzan: recent developments in right to die cases.克鲁赞案后的生死：“死亡权”案件的近期进展
Healthspan. 1992 Jul-Aug;9(7):12-6.
5
6
Response to special section: ethical decision making and persons with mental retardation (CQ vol. 3, no. 2).对特刊的回应：伦理决策与智力障碍者（《CQ》第3卷，第2期）
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1995 Winter;4(1):100-2.
7
After Cruzan: The right to die.
RN. 1991 Jan;54(1):65-6, 68, 70, 73.
8
Chapter 765 revisited: Florida's new advance directives law.第765章再探讨：佛罗里达州新的预先医疗指示法。
Fla State Univ Law Rev. 1992 Fall;20(2):291-365.
9
Advanced directives: common questions.
Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 1993 Fall;8(2):33-4.
10
Informed consent issues in home care.
Caring. 1997 Mar;16(3):46-9.
Zotero 插件