医疗保健计划被责令支付高额罚款。
Health plan ordered to pay high penalty.
作者信息
Lewis A, Delaney A, Erban J
机构信息
Peer Review Analysis, Boston, MA.
出版信息
J Health Care Benefits. 1994 May-Jun;3(5):32-6.
PMID:10133660
Abstract
Litigation on the basis of wrongful denial of medical benefits can literally cripple a health plan. If it can happen at Health Net, it can happen to almost any plan.
摘要
基于不当拒绝医疗福利而提起的诉讼实际上可能会使一个健康保险计划陷入瘫痪。如果这种情况能在健康网（Health Net）发生，那么几乎任何保险计划都可能遭遇。
相似文献
1
Health plan ordered to pay high penalty.医疗保健计划被责令支付高额罚款。
J Health Care Benefits. 1994 May-Jun;3(5):32-6.
2
Patient could not sue insurer for denying coverage.患者不能因保险公司拒绝承保而起诉保险公司。
J Health Care Benefits. 1994 May-Jun;3(5):60-4.
3
How courts view experimental treatments.
J Health Care Benefits. 1994 May-Jun;3(5):37-43.
4
HMO settles out of court; investors appear relieved.健康维护组织庭外和解；投资者似乎松了一口气。
Mod Healthc. 1994 Apr 11;24(15):4.
5
ERISA: protection for the HMO industry against bad faith claims.《雇员退休收入保障法》：保护健康维护组织行业免受恶意索赔。
GHAA J. 1988 Winter;9(2):14-9.
6
ERISA-based defense can shield HMOs from costly suits.基于《雇员退休收入保障法》的抗辩可以保护健康维护组织免受代价高昂的诉讼。
Contract Healthc. 1988 Jun:26-7.
7
When an insurer calls your treatment experimental.当保险公司称你的治疗为试验性治疗时。
Med Econ. 1995 Sep 11;72(17):171-2, 175-6, 178-82.
8
Minimizing employee benefits litigation through effective claims administration procedures.通过有效的索赔管理程序将员工福利诉讼降至最低。
Employee Relat Law J. 1994;20(3):421-31.
9
A magic bullet for managed care.管理式医疗的神奇解决方案。
Bus Health. 1995 Apr;13(4):100.
10
Corcoran v. United Healthcare, Inc.: liability of utilization review companies in light of ERISA.科科伦诉联合健康保险公司：根据《雇员退休收入保障法》审视利用审查公司的责任
J Health Hosp Law. 1993 May;26(5):129-32, 160.
Zotero 插件