• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用系统思维拓展持续质量改进。

Using systems thinking to extend continuous quality improvement.

作者信息

Benson R, Harp N

机构信息

Benson Consulting, Inc., Seattle.

出版信息

Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 1994 Jul-Aug;6(6):17-24.

PMID:10136742
Abstract

Traditional CQI tools have proven effective in improving discrete processes, but the strengths of these tools often render them inappropriate to improve complex systems made up of multiple processes. After finding that CQI tools failed to reduce emergency department waiting times, a QI team applied systems thinking tools and learned that the cause of delays was rooted in interrelationships among processes, such as the impact on laboratory testing when emergent and routine patients arrived back to back. Computer modeling allowed the team to reject some quick fixes--such as adding ED beds--that simulations showed would be ineffective. By reorganizing patient flow and automating hospitalwide bed control, the team so far has reduced waiting times 19 percent and increased patient satisfaction despite an increase in census.

摘要

传统的持续质量改进(CQI)工具已被证明在改进离散流程方面有效,但这些工具的优势往往使其不适用于改进由多个流程组成的复杂系统。在发现CQI工具未能缩短急诊科候诊时间后,一个质量改进团队应用了系统思维工具,并了解到延误的原因源于流程之间的相互关系,比如急症患者和常规患者接踵而至时对实验室检测的影响。计算机建模使该团队摒弃了一些诸如增加急诊床位等的权宜之计,模拟显示这些措施是无效的。通过重新规划患者流程并实现全院床位控制自动化,该团队目前已将候诊时间缩短了19%,尽管就诊人数增加,但患者满意度仍有所提高。

相似文献

1
Using systems thinking to extend continuous quality improvement.运用系统思维拓展持续质量改进。
Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 1994 Jul-Aug;6(6):17-24.
2
Hospital-based continuous quality improvement: a realistic appraisal.基于医院的持续质量改进:现实评估
Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 1993 Apr-Jun;1(2):69-80.
3
The CQI paradigm: a pathway to nurse empowerment in a community hospital.持续质量改进模式:社区医院护士赋权的途径。
Health Care Superv. 1995 Dec;14(2):11-8.
4
Two quality improvement teams: strategies and scores.两个质量改进团队:策略与得分
Manag Care Q. 1993 Spring;1(2):55-61.
5
Computer modeling of patient flow in a pediatric emergency department using discrete event simulation.使用离散事件模拟对儿科急诊科患者流量进行计算机建模。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Jan;23(1):5-10. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31802c611e.
6
Experimental design in health care.医疗保健中的实验设计。
Qual Manag Health Care. 1994 Winter;2(2):13-26.
7
Satisfaction Rx: run hospital like an ED.满意度处方:像急诊科一样运营医院。
ED Manag. 2006 Nov;18(11):128-9.
8
Improving service quality by understanding emergency department flow: a White Paper and position statement prepared for the American Academy of Emergency Medicine.通过了解急诊科流程提高服务质量:为美国急诊医学学会编写的白皮书和立场声明。
J Emerg Med. 2010 Jan;38(1):70-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.03.038. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
9
A reengineering success story: process improvement in emergency department x-ray cycle time, leading to breakthrough performance in the ED ambulatory care (Fast Track) process.一个流程再造的成功案例:急诊科X光检查周期时间的流程改进,带来了急诊科门诊护理(快速通道)流程的突破性表现。
Ambul Outreach. 1997 Winter:24-7.
10
Benchmarking facilitates process improvement in the emergency department.基准测试有助于急诊科的流程改进。
Healthc Financ Manage. 2000 May;54(5):54-9.

引用本文的文献

1
FASStR: a framework for ensuring high-quality operational metrics in health care.FASStR:一个确保医疗保健中高质量运营指标的框架。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Jun 1;26(6):e172-e178. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.43492.
2
Methodological Approaches to Support Process Improvement in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review.方法学途径支持急诊科流程改进:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 13;17(8):2664. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082664.
3
What is the value and impact of quality and safety teams? A scoping review.质量和安全团队的价值和影响是什么?范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2011 Aug 23;6:97. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-97.