Suppr超能文献

美国心脏协会对美国环境保护局医疗废物焚烧炉法规草案的评论与建议。

AHA's comments and recommendations to the U.S. EPA's draft medical waste incinerator regulations.

出版信息

Med Waste Anal. 1994 Aug;2(11):11-6.

Abstract

The following summarizes specific recommendations with respect to the requested regulatory changes discussed above: 1. Either defer publishing the proposed regulations or exclude the emission limits from the proposed regulations until they have been properly established based upon the specific requirements of Sections 111 and 129. 2. Establish the the emission limits on the basis of proper technical analyses, using all necessary data and information which are readily available, and after consulting with state APC agencies as required under Section 111(f)(3). 3. Establish emission limits and requirements for new facilities based upon actual "systems" and according to size classifications. 4. Establish emission limits and requirements for existing facilities using the full range of available data to establish MACT levels according to size classifications. Exclude LAER facilities in the MACT analysis as required under Section 129. 5. Properly account for technical achievability and applicability in setting limits for the various size categories. 6. Properly account for cost and risk implications in establishing emission limits as required under Sections 111 and 129. It is important to highlight that when specific emission values are identified from test data or elsewhere for the in establishing emission limits for new and existing MWIs, it is critical that a proper factor be applied to them as necessary to reflect standard deviations and statistical variables. A recommended methodology for this is included in the U.S. EPA document entitled, Combustion Emissions Technical Resource Document (CETRED), draft, EPA530-4-94-0114, May 1994, Chapter 5, "Determinations of Technically Achievable Emissions." Finally, it is recommended that the U.S. EPA reassess the technical feasibilities and cost implications of various other key issues which have been raised. Such reassessments could be done during the period that emission limits are reassessed and revised.

摘要

以下总结了关于上述所讨论的法规变更请求的具体建议

  1. 要么推迟公布拟议法规,要么在根据第111条和第129条的具体要求妥善确定排放限值之前,将其排除在拟议法规之外。2. 根据适当的技术分析确定排放限值,使用所有现成的必要数据和信息,并按照第111(f)(3)条的要求与州大气污染控制机构进行磋商。3. 根据实际“系统”并按照规模分类确定新设施的排放限值和要求。4. 利用全部现有数据确定现有设施的排放限值和要求,以按照规模分类确定最大可实现控制技术水平。按照第129条的要求,在最大可实现控制技术分析中排除低排放现有设施。5. 在为不同规模类别设定限值时,妥善考虑技术可实现性和适用性。6. 按照第111条和第129条的要求,在确定排放限值时妥善考虑成本和风险影响。需要强调的是,当从测试数据或其他地方确定用于新的和现有的多壁碳纳米管的排放限值的具体排放值时,至关重要的是根据需要对其应用适当的系数,以反映标准偏差和统计变量。美国环境保护局题为《燃烧排放技术资源文件》(CETRED)的文件草稿(EPA530 - 4 - 94 - 0114,1994年5月)第5章“技术上可实现的排放的确定”中包含了对此的推荐方法。最后,建议美国环境保护局重新评估所提出的各种其他关键问题的技术可行性和成本影响。此类重新评估可在排放限值重新评估和修订期间进行。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验