Burke A C, Rafferty J A
College of Social Work, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.
Adm Soc Work. 1994;18(3):59-91. doi: 10.1300/J147v18n03_03.
The authors examine the assumption of the 1980s that the provision and costs of substance abuse services, among others, could best be met by expanding programs in the private sector. The study presents a comparison of public and private substance abuse services, based on data drawn from a national sample of outpatient units, and develops a profile of treatment and financing within three auspice (ownership) categories--private nonprofit, private for-profit, and public. An input-throughput-output framework was used to assess the public-private differences within a wide range of organizational characteristics.
作者们审视了20世纪80年代的一种假设，即物质滥用服务的提供及成本等问题，通过扩大私营部门的项目能够得到最佳解决。该研究基于从全国门诊机构样本中获取的数据，对公共和私营物质滥用服务进行了比较，并勾勒出了三种赞助（所有权）类别——私营非营利性、私营营利性和公共性——的治疗与融资概况。一个投入-产出-产出框架被用于评估广泛组织特征范围内的公私差异。
