Barnes G, Partridge M R
Asthma Training Centre.
Qual Health Care. 1994 Sep;3(3):133-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.3.133.
To establish a baseline of work done in primary care asthma clinics in the United Kingdom and to assess the degree of clinical delegation to nurses and the appropriateness of their training.
Prospective questionnaire survey of asthma care in general practices and a subsidiary survey of all family health services authorities (FHSAs) of the number of asthma clinics in their area.
All 14,251 general practices in the United Kingdom and 117 FHSAs or health boards (Scotland and Northern Ireland).
Questionnaires were returned by 4327 (30.4%) general practices, 54% being completed by practice nurses and 22% by general practitioners; in 24% profession was not stated. In all, 77.2% (3339/4327) of respondents ran an asthma clinic. 60 FHSAs state the number of asthma clinics at the time of the general practice survey (total 3653 clinics); within responding FHSAs 1702 (46.6%) practices running an asthma clinic replied to the general practice survey. Clinics exclusive for patients with asthma mostly occurred in practices with five or more general practitioners (70.2%), compared with single-handed practices (31.7%). The average number of asthma clinics run per practice was five a month; the average duration was 2 hours and 20 minutes. 1131 (48.8%) nurses ran clinics by themselves, 1180 (47.9%) with the doctor, and 39 (1.7%) had no medical input. Comprehensive questioning occurred other than for nasal (872, 26.1%) or oesophageal (335, 10.0%) symptoms and use of aspirin and non-steroidal drugs (1161, 33.4%). Growth in children was measured by only a third of respondents. Of the 1131 nurses who ran clinics alone, 251 (22.2%) did so without formal training entailing assessment.
Asthma clinics are now common in general practice and much of their work is done by nurses, a significant minority of whom may not have had sufficient training.
As this survey is probably biased toward the more asthma aware practices, greater deficiencies in training and standards may exist in other practices. Further evaluation of the effectiveness of asthma clinics is needed.
建立英国基层医疗哮喘诊所工作的基线,并评估临床工作委托给护士的程度及其培训的适宜性。
对全科医疗中的哮喘护理进行前瞻性问卷调查,并对所有家庭健康服务机构(FHSA)所在地区哮喘诊所的数量进行辅助调查。
英国所有14251家全科诊所以及117家FHSA或健康委员会(苏格兰和北爱尔兰)。
4327家(30.4%)全科诊所返回了问卷,其中54%由执业护士完成,22%由全科医生完成;24%未注明填写者职业。总计77.2%(3339/4327)的受访者开设了哮喘诊所。60家FHSA在全科医疗调查时说明了哮喘诊所的数量(总计3653家诊所);在回复的FHSA中,1702家(46.6%)开设哮喘诊所的诊所回复了全科医疗调查。仅收治哮喘患者的诊所大多出现在有五名或更多全科医生的诊所(70.2%),而单人诊所的比例为31.7%。每家诊所平均每月开设哮喘诊所的次数为五次;平均时长为2小时20分钟。1131名(48.8%)护士独自开设诊所,1180名(47.9%)与医生一起开设诊所,39名(1.7%)没有医生参与。除了询问鼻部(872例,26.1%)或食管(335例,10.0%)症状以及阿司匹林和非甾体类药物的使用情况(1161例,33.4%)外,还进行了全面问诊。只有三分之一的受访者测量了儿童的生长情况。在独自开设诊所的1131名护士中,251名(22.2%)在没有进行需要评估的正规培训的情况下就独自开设诊所。
哮喘诊所在全科医疗中现在很常见,其大部分工作由护士完成,其中相当一部分护士可能没有接受过足够的培训。
由于本次调查可能偏向于对哮喘更关注的诊所,其他诊所可能在培训和标准方面存在更大的不足。需要对哮喘诊所的有效性进行进一步评估。