Deber R, Wiktorowicz M, Leatt P, Champagne F
Department of Health Administration, University of Toronto, Ontario.
Healthc Manage Forum. 1994 Winter;7(4):18-27. doi: 10.1016/S0840-4704(10)61074-5.
A 1990 nation-wide survey on technology acquisition in Canadian hospitals, based on 509 Anglophone and 55 Francophone hospital questionnaires and 193 hospital equipment request forms, revealed that 53% of capital funds were used to replace existing equipment, with the remainder spent on new purchases. However, very little regional planning was taking place. Most of the institutional acquisition decisions were made by committees, 17% of which were classified as medical staff, 25.1% as administrative, 32.4% as board committees and 22.5% as mixed. Although administration was heavily represented, medical staff were frequently present and nursing was just as likely to have at least minimal representation. However, technical experts usually played a minimal role. This omission, combined with the limited information asked for on equipment request forms and the limited availability and use of technology assessment information, suggests that acquisition decisions in many Canadian hospitals are likely to be based on inadequate information.
1990年在加拿大医院进行的一项全国性技术购置调查,以509份英语医院问卷和55份法语医院问卷以及193份医院设备申请表为基础,结果显示53%的资本资金用于更换现有设备,其余资金用于新设备购置。然而,区域规划却很少。大多数机构购置决策由委员会做出,其中17%为医务人员委员会,25.1%为行政委员会,32.4%为董事会委员会,22.5%为混合委员会。虽然行政部门占主导地位,但医务人员也经常参与,护理人员至少也有最低限度的参与。然而,技术专家通常发挥的作用很小。这种疏忽,再加上设备申请表所要求的信息有限以及技术评估信息的可用性和使用有限,表明许多加拿大医院的购置决策可能是基于不充分的信息做出的。