• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

子宫切除术的替代方法:对管理式医疗的临床和经济影响

Alternative approaches to hysterectomy: clinical and economic implications for managed care.

作者信息

Trotter J P, Glasser M H

出版信息

Med Interface. 1995 Mar;8(3):123-9.

PMID:10141385
Abstract

Hysterectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures in the United States. Through advances in pharmacological and surgical technologies, opportunities now exist for converting selected hysterectomies from the traditional abdominal approach to vaginal or laparoscopically-assisted vaginal procedures. Such conversions may lead to diminished operative morbidity, fewer hospital days, a decreased period of convalescence, and the opportunity for cost savings. This paper reviews current clinical thought on the subject and considers the economic effect for providers of care.

摘要

子宫切除术是美国最常实施的外科手术之一。随着药理学和外科技术的进步,现在有机会将某些子宫切除术从传统的腹部手术方式转变为经阴道或腹腔镜辅助阴道手术。这种转变可能会降低手术发病率、减少住院天数、缩短康复期,并有可能节省费用。本文回顾了关于该主题的当前临床观点,并探讨了对医疗服务提供者的经济影响。

相似文献

1
Alternative approaches to hysterectomy: clinical and economic implications for managed care.子宫切除术的替代方法:对管理式医疗的临床和经济影响
Med Interface. 1995 Mar;8(3):123-9.
2
Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care.开放性腹部子宫切除术与腹腔镜及阴道子宫切除术:对美国一家大型医保机构护理质量与成本的分析
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.018.
3
Costs and charges associated with three alternative techniques of hysterectomy.与三种子宫切除术替代技术相关的成本和费用。
N Engl J Med. 1996 Aug 15;335(7):476-82. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199608153350705.
4
Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. abdominal hysterectomy in a community hospital. A cost comparison.社区医院中腹腔镜次全子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术的成本比较
J Reprod Med. 1999 Apr;44(4):339-45.
5
Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy for cost-effectiveness to employers.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与传统子宫切除术对雇主的成本效益比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;190(6):1714-20; discussion 1720-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.059.
6
Hospital cost comparison between abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomies.腹式子宫切除术、阴式子宫切除术及腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术的医院成本比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May;83(5 Pt 1):713-6.
7
Use of alternative techniques of hysterectomy in Ohio, 1988-1994.1988 - 1994年俄亥俄州子宫切除术替代技术的应用情况
N Engl J Med. 1996 Aug 15;335(7):483-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199608153350706.
8
National trends and determinants of hospitalization costs and lengths-of-stay for uterine fibroids procedures.子宫肌瘤手术住院费用和住院时长的全国趋势及影响因素。
J Health Care Finance. 2007 Spring;33(3):1-16.
9
Clinical and cost comparisons for hysterectomy via abdominal, standard laparoscopic, vaginal and robot-assisted approaches.经腹、标准腹腔镜、经阴道及机器人辅助途径子宫切除术的临床及成本比较。
S D Med. 2011 Jun;64(6):197-9, 201, 203 passim.
10
Average charges for three types of hysterectomy procedures: United States, 1998.1998年美国三种子宫切除手术的平均费用。
Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co. 2000 Apr-Jun;81(2):27-36.